From: Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:11:22 -0400
> "BR" == Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BR> Lisp goes even farther down the road of blurring the boundary
BR> between interpreter and compiler than Perl does. You can even
BR> run cod
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Lisp goes even farther down the road of blurring the boundary between
> interpreter and compiler than Perl does. You can even run code at read
> time, when the program is being parsed by the compiler (or interpreter).
>
Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:18:07 -0400
>
>. . . perl is both an interpreter and compiler. this is a common
>statement but what does it mean? why are somethings only an
>interpreter or compiler? why is script used when per
> "BR" == Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BR>From: Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BR>Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:18:07 -0400
BR>. . . perl is both an interpreter and compiler. this is a common
BR>statement but what does it mean? why are somethings only an
BR>
From: Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:18:07 -0400
. . . perl is both an interpreter and compiler. this is a common
statement but what does it mean? why are somethings only an
interpreter or compiler? why is script used when perl is a
programming language
> "JR" == John Redford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JR> What was the goal of this quiz?
JR> These are questions. That much is true. But what are given as "answers"
JR> would be better called "responses".
JR> Such questions, collectively, do not have answers, other than fiat
JR> defi
> "PH" == Philipp Hanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PH> I thought that the "Why Is Programming Hard?" and "Why Is Programming
PH> Easy" questions would be interesting to augment with a similar pair:
PH> "Why do non-programmers perceive programming as hard/easy?"
i recall you mentioned
I thought that the "Why Is Programming Hard?" and "Why Is Programming
Easy" questions would be interesting to augment with a similar pair:
"Why do non-programmers perceive programming as hard/easy?"
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m.org] On B
> "CD" == Chris Devers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CD> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> and yes, the person who posted answers to the bonus question did hit
>> upon the correct answer which ruined it for the talk. several people
>> agreed with it as they didn't have to rack
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Uri Guttman wrote:
> and yes, the person who posted answers to the bonus question did hit
> upon the correct answer which ruined it for the talk. several people
> agreed with it as the
hi quiz kids!
i think the quiz talk went over pretty well. i counted about 16
attendees. there were fun and heated discussions on most every question
along with some nasty jokes tossed in like grenades. it was a much more
interactive talk than we usually see as it was meant to be that way. and
s
11 matches
Mail list logo
