On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 13:59 -0400, Ricker, William wrote:
> LIMITS -- As near as Google can tell, the limit on 32bit is 2GB for
> filesystem (signed numbers! Fie!), 4GB for process memory (unsigned,
> yeah!).
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en==Perl+32-bit+2-GB+OR+4-GB+x86
On x86 hardware the
At work, the 64bit Power4/Power5 IBM AIX systems come with 32-bit Perl.
After reading the README, I wasn't interested in building everything in
64-bit, so when I build a Perl to build DBI with, I build it with
similar settings to the vendor's (unsupported, "contributed") 32-bit
Perl. If one of my
Original Message -
> From: "Sherm Pendley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "James Eshelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] 64 bit perl boost?
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Jame
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] 64 bit perl boost?
On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:23 AM, James Eshelman wrote:
> I have a large O-O perl system running on Fedora Core 3 ( I know,
> it's old! - that's a separate subject) on Xenon 64-bit
> processors. The perl
On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:23 AM, James Eshelman wrote:
> I have a large O-O perl system running on Fedora Core 3 ( I know,
> it's old! - that's a separate subject) on Xenon 64-bit
> processors. The perl interpreter is only a 32-bit app. Anyone
> have an idea how much performance boost we're
I have a large O-O perl system running on Fedora Core 3 ( I know, it's old! -
that's a separate subject) on Xenon 64-bit processors. The perl interpreter
is only a 32-bit app. Anyone have an idea how much performance boost we're
likely to get by recompiling everything for 64-bits? Looks
6 matches
Mail list logo
