On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:30:02PM -0500, Ricker, William wrote:
> > > > Newer perls ship with cpanp as well (p as in plus), which is even
> > > > slicker.
> > p5p have talked quite a bit of deprecating CPANPLUS and removing it from
> > core.
> Really ? I'd missed that. What's the beef?
Dunno, I
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Bill Ricker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
>
>> Kind of intrigued: what's new or any changes on the book particularly?
>
>
> A couple of the modules that he wrote for the book were best thinking then,
> but were bypassed by progre
> > > Newer perls ship with cpanp as well (p as in plus), which is even slicker.
> p5p have talked quite a bit of deprecating CPANPLUS and removing it from
core.
Really ? I'd missed that. What's the beef?
I find cpanp's API good for scripting a site_perl library build.
> > (And CpanM provides
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Bill Ricker wrote:
> > So, is the CPAN.pm module still the recommended way to install perl
> > modules?
Yes.
Or cpanm.
> > Newer perls ship with cpanp as well (p as in plus), which is even slicker.
p5p have talked quite a bit of deprecating CPANPLUS and
Greg London
>So, is the CPAN.pm module still the recommended way to install perl
> modules?
> What is the recommended way for creating modules to upload to CPAN?
> Used to be h2xs a long time ago.
> I'm a bit out of date.
You're not the only one. These would make good topics for a
meeting/pres
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Kind of intrigued: what's new or any changes on the book particularly?
A couple of the modules that he wrote for the book were best thinking then,
but were bypassed by progress and never fully evolved.
There's an errata page at Oreilly,
Hello.
2013/01/17 21:03:45 -0500 Bill Ricker => To Greg London :
BR> > So, is the CPAN.pm module still the recommended way to install perl
BR> > modules?
BR> >
BR> > Newer perls ship with cpanp as well (p as in plus), which is even slicker.
BR> (And CpanM provides local mini mirror.)
BR>
BR>
BR
> So, is the CPAN.pm module still the recommended way to install perl
> modules?
>
> Newer perls ship with cpanp as well (p as in plus), which is even slicker.
(And CpanM provides local mini mirror.)
> What is the recommended way for creating modules to upload to CPAN?
> Used to be h2xs a long ti
So, is the CPAN.pm module still the recommended way to install perl modules?
What is the recommended way for creating modules to upload to CPAN?
Used to be h2xs a long time ago.
I'm a bit out of date.
Greg
___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.p
9 matches
Mail list logo
