Re: [Boston.pm] FW: GBC/ACM Announcements

2004-06-12 Thread Glen Peterson
I was at the business meeting last year, such as it was. It didn't take 15 minutes, more like 3 minutes. They just voted by show of hands at the start of the lecture. As I remember, last year all the incumbents were re-elected - they had no-one running against them. It seemed as though that

Re: [Boston.pm] FW: GBC/ACM Announcements

2004-06-12 Thread Bill Ricker N1VUX
I have to agree with Ron again, that's twice this year, wow. Ron Newman wrote: > GBC/ACM meetings are always open to the public. Yes, GBC/ACM meetings are very open, that's one of their recruiting techniques; hold good meetings, let the public in, sell memberships at the exits. ;-) Good group

Re: [Boston.pm] FW: GBC/ACM Announcements

2004-06-11 Thread Ron Newman
On Jun 11, 2004, at 11:21 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote: Good question. So far as I know, it's open to the public. (I assumed it was, at least, but I completely forgot to check) GBC/ACM meetings are always open to the public. ___ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Boston.pm] FW: GBC/ACM Announcements

2004-06-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 2:42 PM -0400 6/11/04, Tolkin, Steve wrote: I believe that the technical portion of this, i.e. the talk on Parrot by Dan, is open to the public. (But I have not checked. Dan, do you know?) Good question. So far as I know, it's open to the public. (I assumed it was, at least, but I completely

[Boston.pm] FW: GBC/ACM Announcements

2004-06-11 Thread Tolkin, Steve
I believe that the technical portion of this, i.e. the talk on Parrot by Dan, is open to the public. (But I have not checked. Dan, do you know?) Steve -Original Message- From: Kenneth Baclawski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:03 PM To: Tolkin, Steve Subject: