Re: [Boston.pm] Junction performance

> "JP" == Jerrad Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JP> Exactly, but being greased lightning I didn't feel it was necessary to JP> substitute teflon for grease :-P speed and benchmarking aside, i felt it was better and easier to read code. :) and i was also writing for the list about acc

Re: [Boston.pm] Junction performance

Exactly, but being greased lightning I didn't feel it was necessary to substitute teflon for grease :-P Your code reports: ANY: s/iterQSP6 QS 1.20-- -98% P6 2.10e-002 5611%-- ALL: RateQSP6 QS 1.46/s-- -98% P6 79.2/s 5337%-- -- H4sICNoBwDoAA3NpZwA

Re: [Boston.pm] Junction performance

> "JP" == Jerrad Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JP> In case anyone is interested: JP> ANY: JP> s/iterQSP6 JP> QS 1.22-- -98% JP> P6 2.04e-002 5889%-- JP> ALL: JP> RateQSP6 JP> QS 1.44/s-- -98% JP> P6 78.0/s 5318%-- quite

[Boston.pm] Junction performance

In case anyone is interested: ANY: s/iterQSP6 QS 1.22-- -98% P6 2.04e-002 5889%-- ALL: RateQSP6 QS 1.44/s-- -98% P6 78.0/s 5318%-- __CODE__ package Bob; use Perl6::Junction; use Quantum::Superpositions; package main; use Benchmark; sub ANY{ i