OT(even-more-so) RE: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-25 Thread Ricker, William
> the expansion slot section I think that was only on the VT-103 that had that slot. > could even take an LSI-11 board and the The 2nd-gen prototype for the Ungerman-Bass CATV-style WAN was built at MITRE (MITRENET) using boards in the LSI-11's slot to mount the on-board switch/modem. Two BNCs

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-23 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Hello Uri, > FL> The fact that so many people still remember these thigs is kinda > scary... > > you always remember your first geek love! :) here here, I understand very well =) > you have to understand the vt100 phenomenon. not far before there were > no cheap crt terminals. they all were p

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:58 AM + 4/22/05, Federico Lucifredi wrote: Someone asked if it is a 102... I think it is a plain 100 as far as I can remember. As I gather that the 102s had the same case but a different bezel, it should be easy to tell once I am home. Not necessarily -- a lot of the 100s had add-on kit

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 1:23 PM -0400 4/22/05, Spider Boardman wrote: Dan's description of how to tell whether your VT100 was upgraded is correct, but it's not quite true that an upgraded one is at VT102 levels. There are firmware bugs in VT100's which are not fixed by the 'advanced video option' which made them suppor

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-22 Thread Uri Guttman
> "FL" == Federico Lucifredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: FL> Hello Guys, >> Dan's description of how to tell whether your VT100 was upgraded is >> correct, but it's not quite true that an upgraded one is at VT102 levels. >> There are firmware bugs in VT100's which are not fixed by the

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-22 Thread Spider Boardman
Dan's description of how to tell whether your VT100 was upgraded is correct, but it's not quite true that an upgraded one is at VT102 levels. There are firmware bugs in VT100's which are not fixed by the 'advanced video option' which made them support 132x24 and insert/delete line. Those are fixed

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-22 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Hello Guys, > Dan's description of how to tell whether your VT100 was upgraded is > correct, but it's not quite true that an upgraded one is at VT102 levels. > There are firmware bugs in VT100's which are not fixed by the 'advanced > video option' which made them support 132x24 and insert/delete l

RE: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-22 Thread Ricker, William
>(The response to a query for device ID >is also different, but that's getting into the excessively arcane.) The response to "Factory Self Test" ESC sequence with the "Repeat til Power Off" modifier is most amusing, according to my memory of what happened when I emailed it to my officemate. Bill

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-21 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Hello Guys, URI> i have nightmares from my serial line days. so many years working on URI> them in so many ways. and of course with vt-100s all around. How bad can that be =) >From Tom and Ben's comments, I gather it is a standard DB25 with a null modem >I need. Doh - I expected something more

Re: Serial Cables RE: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-21 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:55, Ricker, William wrote: > A real working VT-100, that's a blast from the past. I hope it's > actually a VT-102, that's the sweet spot iirc. I assume you've already > found http://vt100.net/ . With a real VT-100, you can watch all the old > Christmas Card animations [ ht

Re: Serial Cables RE: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-21 Thread David Cantrell
Ricker, William wrote: Yes, LapLink cables (or similar brands of PC-PC non-networking e.g. WinConnect) are great specs for null-modem cables suitably gendered for PCs. They even usually have the 25-9 pin adapter built in as a triplehead cable or some such. The Laplink cable I have has 25 and 9 pin

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-21 Thread Chris Devers
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Federico Lucifredi wrote: > I know everything I need about setting tty lines in Linux. What I do > not know (and the expertise of the old timers here is the key) is what > kind of cable to use to connect the darn thing... what is it called? > Where do I find it? I can make

Serial Cables RE: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-21 Thread Ricker, William
A real working VT-100, that's a blast from the past. I hope it's actually a VT-102, that's the sweet spot iirc. I assume you've already found http://vt100.net/ . With a real VT-100, you can watch all the old Christmas Card animations [ http://artscene.textfiles.com/vt100/ ] -- I've seen Perl scrip

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-21 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 2:37 PM +0100 4/21/05, David Cantrell wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:44:34PM -0400, Andrew Medico wrote: On Apr 20, 2005, at 20:32, Federico Lucifredi wrote: > please excuse my totally Perl-unrelated question, but I am sure more >than a few of you will appreciate the idea: I want to get my

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-21 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:44:34PM -0400, Andrew Medico wrote: > On Apr 20, 2005, at 20:32, Federico Lucifredi wrote: > > please excuse my totally Perl-unrelated question, but I am sure more > >than a few of you will appreciate the idea: I want to get my working > >VT-100 connected to a Linux ser

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-20 Thread Uri Guttman
> "BT" == Ben Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BT> On 4/20/05, Andrew Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Apr 20, 2005, at 20:32, Federico Lucifredi wrote: >> >> > Hello Fellow Mongers, >> > please excuse my totally Perl-unrelated question, but I am sure more >> > than a few

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-20 Thread Stephen A. Jarjoura
I've seen "Null Modem Cables" selling at Best Buy / Circuit City type stores. You won't even have to write one yourself! Ben Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/20/05, Andrew Medico wrote: > On Apr 20, 2005, at 20:32, Federico Lucifredi wrote: > > What you're looking for is a "null modem" seri

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-20 Thread Geoff Rowell
On 4/20/05, Ben Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/20/05, Andrew Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 20, 2005, at 20:32, Federico Lucifredi wrote: > > > > > Hello Fellow Mongers, > > > please excuse my totally Perl-unrelated question, but I am sure more > > > than a few of you will a

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-20 Thread Ben Tilly
On 4/20/05, Andrew Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 20, 2005, at 20:32, Federico Lucifredi wrote: > > > Hello Fellow Mongers, > > please excuse my totally Perl-unrelated question, but I am sure more > > than a few of you will appreciate the idea: I want to get my working > > VT-100 conn

Re: [Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-20 Thread Andrew Medico
On Apr 20, 2005, at 20:32, Federico Lucifredi wrote: Hello Fellow Mongers, please excuse my totally Perl-unrelated question, but I am sure more than a few of you will appreciate the idea: I want to get my working VT-100 connected to a Linux server to read e-mail in a *very* old style way ;-)

[Boston.pm] OT(very):VT-100 Project

2005-04-20 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Hello Fellow Mongers, please excuse my totally Perl-unrelated question, but I am sure more than a few of you will appreciate the idea: I want to get my working VT-100 connected to a Linux server to read e-mail in a *very* old style way ;-) I know everything I need about setting tty lines in Li