On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Dan Boger wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:33:10PM -0400, Federico Lucifredi wrote:
LOL... hadn't thought of that one. Besides, would you really want to
sshcache your password just for that?
Don't need to cache your password, just create a key that executes this
one command, a
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:33:10PM -0400, Federico Lucifredi wrote:
> LOL... hadn't thought of that one. Besides, would you really want to
> sshcache your password just for that?
Don't need to cache your password, just create a key that executes this
one command, and use that. Assuming, of course
On Jul 15, 2004, at 6:34 AM, Tal Cohen wrote:
With regards to portability, it is
OK if I end up writing different code for different machines (BAD Tal,
BAD!!!). However I do want to keep it as light weight and internal as
possible.
If you can't use an external infrastructure like SNMP, then you are
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Federico Lucifredi wrote:
I could try to list the horrors of past versions of SNMP, but Chris
seems much more of an expert in it so I will pass the honor and go to
bed instead. z
:-)
Well, no, not an expert as such, I was mainly just summarizing examples
from App
is a great help!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andrew M. Langmead
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 11:24 PM
To: 'Boston.PM'
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Is there a module to access memory usage?
On Jul 14, 2004, at 3:56 PM, Mike Will
Chris just wrote:
> On the downside, there are completely different, filthy details, but at
> least they're portably filthy. :-)
It should also be pointed out that some of the older versions of SNMP were,
err... slightly unsafe in a security sense. Newer versions (are we up to 5
now?) seem to hav
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Timothy Kohl wrote:
But of course, this isn't portable. It won't work on Windows -- which
was specifically asked for -- and it also won't work on OSX or various
other Unix variants.
Back to square one?
The point is, there is obviously no portable way to do this except
code a b
> But of course, this isn't portable. It won't work on Windows -- which
> was specifically asked for -- and it also won't work on OSX or various
> other Unix variants.
>
> Back to square one?
>
The point is, there is obviously no portable way to do this except code
a bunch of different var
Fellow Speakeasy User Mike Burns wrote:
> > If this is done under UNIX/Linux, it might be easier than you think:
just
>
> > poke around the proc filesystem and you might find that all you need is
> > really there
Hey pal, I did not guarantee it for *all* variants.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Devers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As long as you're happy with memory available to DOS that is. :-/
LOL... hadn't thought of that one. Besides, would you really want to
sshcache your password just for that?
> But hey, 666.0K ought to be enough for anybody!
On Jul 14, 2004, at 3:56 PM, Mike Williams wrote:
Tal Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Tal Cohen wrote:
>> I need to write a script that will return how much memory (RAM) is
a
>> system as well as how much of it is being used. Can anyone assist?
One question that I have just
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Timothy Kohl wrote:
Forwarded message:
I need to write a script that will return how much memory (RAM)
is on a system as well as how much of it is being used. Can anyone
assist?
If this is done under UNIX/Linux, it might be easier than you think:
just poke around the pr
--- Federico Lucifredi mumbled on 2004-07-14 23.06.01 -0400 ---
> > I need to write a script that will return how much memory (RAM) is on
> a
> > system as well as how much of it is being used. Can anyone assist?
>
> If this is done under UNIX/Linux, it might be easier than you think: just
Forwarded message:
>
> > I need to write a script that will return how much memory (RAM) is on
> a
> > system as well as how much of it is being used. Can anyone assist?
>
> If this is done under UNIX/Linux, it might be easier than you think: just
> poke around the proc filesystem and yo
> I need to write a script that will return how much memory (RAM) is on
a
> system as well as how much of it is being used. Can anyone assist?
If this is done under UNIX/Linux, it might be easier than you think: just
poke around the proc filesystem and you might find that all you need is
real
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Devers
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 4:33 PM
> To: Tal Cohen
> Cc: 'Boston.PM'
> Subject: RE: [Boston.pm] Is there a module to access memory usage?
>
>
&
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, David Cantrell wrote:
Tal Cohen wrote:
I know, but that is what I am stuck with (besides, what is wrong with
writing platform independent code?). I could use a Windows/DOS batch
command...if I knew which one to use.
mem, I think.
Yes, this seems to work -- sort of:
% ssh $w
Tal Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Tal Cohen wrote:
>>Hi All,
>>
>> I need to write a script that will return how much memory (RAM) is a
>> system as well as how much of it is being used. Can anyone assist?
>>
Anthony R. J. Ball wrote:
>
> `top -n 1` will spit out one ite
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Tal Cohen wrote:
Yeah, I thought of that. I was hoping for a platform independent
mechanism. If not, then I can use this type of methodology, but how do
I account for Windows based machines?
Set up SNMP on each client and write generic, cross-platform scripts
that can make S
t; If not, then I can use this type of methodology, but
> how do I account for
> Windows based machines?
>
> Tal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony R. J. Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:14 PM
> To: Tal Cohen
> Cc: '
Tal Cohen wrote:
I know, but that is what I am stuck with (besides, what is wrong with
writing platform independent code?). I could use a Windows/DOS batch
command...if I knew which one to use.
mem, I think.
--
David Cantrell | Degenerate | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david
[OS X] appeals to m
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Tal Cohen wrote:
> Yeah, I thought of that. I was hoping for a platform independent mechanism.
> If not, then I can use this type of methodology, but how do I account for
> Windows based machines?
http://search.cpan.org/search?query=Win32+memory&mode=all
Dear Tal -
> "Tal" == Tal Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tal> Hi All, I need to write a script that will return how much
Tal> memory (RAM) is on a system as well as how much of it is
Tal> being used. Can anyone assist?
You may find some helpful ideas in the Nagios (http://www
Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:54 PM
To: Tal Cohen
Cc: 'Boston.PM'
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Is there a module to access memory usage?
I will refrain from rude comment ;)
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Tal Cohen wrote:
> Yeah, I thou
>
> Tal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony R. J. Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:14 PM
> To: Tal Cohen
> Cc: 'Boston.PM'
> Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Is there a module to access memory usage?
>
>
> `top -n 1`
To: Tal Cohen
Cc: 'Boston.PM'
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Is there a module to access memory usage?
`top -n 1` will spit out one iteration of top that you could then
parse.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Tal Cohen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to write a script t
`top -n 1` will spit out one iteration of top that you could then
parse.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Tal Cohen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to write a script that will return how much memory (RAM) is on a
> system as well as how much of it is being used. Can anyone assist?
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
