On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 12:55 +0530, Srinivas M.A. wrote:
Ahh, I didn't copy bridge-stp to /sbin because I didn't think it was
needed. Just to test I blindly copied it to /sbin and did:
brclt addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl stp br0
and it hung my board :(
What did
All
We are running a setup with a large number of bridge ports that
reaches the 900 ports. After switching to recent kernel and brctl-
utils that uses the sysfs interface, we started noticing that the port
numbers are mis-reported when issues the command:
brctl showmacs br1
After tracing the
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:11:31 +0200
Osama Abu Elsorour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All
We are running a setup with a large number of bridge ports that
reaches the 900 ports. After switching to recent kernel and brctl-
utils that uses the sysfs interface, we started noticing that the port
So I both get a SEGV and the kernel thinks userspace is running STP, not
ideal.
Segfault is fixed by this:
diff --git a/log.h b/log.h
index ce0d94e..2fcdcfb 100644
--- a/log.h
+++ b/log.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ extern int log_level;
#ifdef NO_DAEMON
#define ERROR(_fmt, _args...) \
-
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 31 mars 2008 19:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] RSTP in
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/shemminger/rstp.git; a=summary
problems
On Mon,
I don't like the bridge-stp bridge start/stop interface. Why
would bridge-stp know what bridge to run RTSP on? A more natural
way, IMHO, would to extend brctl with a rstp on method. Why
is there one rstpctl tool and one brctl tool?
I wrote rstpctl to just control the rstp daemon. Should
