On Tuesday 20 December 2011 20:11:17 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I had to go do real work last week.
> Let me test and look at it more detail.
> There is no urgency, the problem has existed for many years.
Please excuse me. It was only my impatience and "deferred" status on the
David's patchwork s
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:59:11 +0200
Vitalii Demianets wrote:
> Hello, Stephen!
> I can not understand your silence.
> There are issues fixed by the patch in question. For example, if the
> interface
> is left in blocking state after stp was turned off, that state is not
> stable - it can flip t
Hello, Stephen!
I can not understand your silence.
There are issues fixed by the patch in question. For example, if the interface
is left in blocking state after stp was turned off, that state is not
stable - it can flip to forwarding state in unpredictable times, e.g. when
_any other_ slave of
