On 03/13/2013 02:22 AM, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" wrote:
13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vlad Yasevich" :
The series adds an ability for the bridge to function in non-promiscuous mode.
What is the practical applications for such setup? In other words,
in which cases I would want to put bridge into non-pro
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:45:23 -0400
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Add an sysfs interface to turn promiscusous mode on and off on
> the bridge. By default all interfaces in the bridge
> are in promisc mode. When promisc mode is turned off, it is
> turned off on all bridge ports and the bridge turns on I
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:12:29 -0400
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 02:22 AM, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" wrote:
> >
> >
> > 13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vlad Yasevich" :
> >
> >> The series adds an ability for the bridge to function in non-promiscuous
> >> mode.
> >
> > What is the practical applications
On 03/13/2013 11:38 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:45:23 -0400
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Add an sysfs interface to turn promiscusous mode on and off on
the bridge. By default all interfaces in the bridge
are in promisc mode. When promisc mode is turned off, it is
turned off o
On 03/13/2013 11:39 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:12:29 -0400
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
On 03/13/2013 02:22 AM, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" wrote:
13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vlad Yasevich" :
The series adds an ability for the bridge to function in non-promiscuous mode.
What is the
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:45:40 -0400
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 11:39 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:12:29 -0400
> > Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/13/2013 02:22 AM, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vlad Yasevich" :
> >>>
>
After upgrading the kernel on the box that acts as a bridge between my
wireless and wired networks I observed that access to my UPnP media
servers became unreliable.
I tried a number of kernel versions to attempt to establish when things
went wrong and got as far as
3.4 - works
3.5.7 - doesn
Linux 3.8 has a header, include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h that uses a
struct in6_addr but doesn't define it. The trivial seeming fix of
including the header that does define it causes more problems. The
problem was discussed on mailing lists in January 2013. The final
suggestion I found was here:
On 03/06/2013 06:31 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Implement IFF_UNICAST_FLT on the bridge. Unicast addresses added
to the bridge device are synched to the uplink devices. This
allows for uplink devices to change while preserving mac assignment.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich
---
[...]
diff --git
On 08/03/13 02:07, Cong Wang wrote:
From: Cong Wang
This is a long-standing bug and reported several times:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136164389416341&w=2
This bug can be observed in virt environment, when a KVM guest
communicates with
From: Wei Yongjun
Using for_each_set_bit_from() to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
---
net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
index b0812c9..48fe761 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
+++
From: Wei Yongjun
Using for_each_set_bit() to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
---
net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 5 +
net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 10 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
index 27
This uses PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in order to increase
readability.
Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu
---
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_broute.c |4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_broute.c
b/net/bridge/netfilter/
13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vlad Yasevich" :
> The series adds an ability for the bridge to function in non-promiscuous mode.
What is the practical applications for such setup? In other words,
in which cases I would want to put bridge into non-promiscuous
mode and specify some uplink ports?
--
wbr, O
On 03/13/2013 12:09 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:45:40 -0400
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
On 03/13/2013 11:39 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:12:29 -0400
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
On 03/13/2013 02:22 AM, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" wrote:
13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vla
I agree that this is a useful behavior, often we will use a bridge in
the same scenario (multiple virtio tap adapters belonging to VM's)
another scenario is when creating a bridge for chaining multiple VPN's
together.
-Joel
On 14 March 2013 06:04, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 12:09 PM, S
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:04:51PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 12:09 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:45:40 -0400
> >Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> >
> >>On 03/13/2013 11:39 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:12:29 -0400
> >>>Vlad Yasevich wrote
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:22PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> The series adds an ability for the bridge to function in non-promiscuous mode.
> We do it in 3 steps.
> First we add an interface to palce the switch into non-promisc mode. In
> this mode, all port of the switch turn promisc off and
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
> may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
> list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich
It looks like if you make two links uplink, bridging
between them won't wo
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:33:33 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> > Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
> > may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
> > list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich
On 03/13/2013 04:33 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich
It looks like if you make two
21 matches
Mail list logo
