From: Toshiaki Makita
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 20:53:32 +0900
> br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
> or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita
I'm applying this as-is for now, even though I saw t
From: Linus Lüssing
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 23:20:16 +0200
> Oh, I'm sorry, I thought it'd only be necessary for the v1
> patchset. Going to change that from now on. Anyways, here it is
> (copied 'n' pasted):
When I ask for changes, you need to make a new fresh submission
of your patch(s).
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:43:11AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Linus Lüssing
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:42:15 +0200
>
> > Changes in v3:
> >
> > * use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL()
>
> This is not a sufficient header posting.
>
> You must also describe at a high level
On 06/05/2014 08:55 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Toshiaki Makita
>> (2014/06/05 20:03), David Laight wrote:
>>> From: Toshiaki Makita
br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
On 06/05/2014 09:01 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> (2014/06/05 21:30), Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 08:53:32PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
>>> or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of
(2014/06/05 21:55), David Laight wrote:
> From: Toshiaki Makita
>> (2014/06/05 20:03), David Laight wrote:
>>> From: Toshiaki Makita
br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
Sig
(2014/06/05 21:30), Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 08:53:32PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
>> or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 08:53:32PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
> or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita
> ---
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file chan
br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita
---
net/bridge/br_if.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/brid
(2014/06/05 20:03), David Laight wrote:
> From: Toshiaki Makita
>> br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
>> or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita
>> ---
>> net/bridge/br_if.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file
br_manage_promisc() incorrectly expects br_auto_port() to return only 0
or 1, while it actually returns flags, i.e., a subset of BR_AUTO_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita
---
net/bridge/br_if.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge
From: Linus Lüssing
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:42:15 +0200
> Changes in v3:
>
> * use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL()
This is not a sufficient header posting.
You must also describe at a high level what this patch series is
doing, and why you are doing it.
12 matches
Mail list logo
