On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:37, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:30:08PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, but I have sent you several emails telling you about the problems
>> I have with running the selftests due to changes in the phy etc. Maybe
>> you have just not received
On 30/03/2023 13:29, Hans Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:37, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:30:08PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, but I have sent you several emails telling you about the problems
>>> I have with running the selftests due to changes in th
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> So the solution would be to not let the DSA layer send the
> SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED event in the case when the new dynamic flag is
> set?
I have never said that.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 15:43, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
>> So the solution would be to not let the DSA layer send the
>> SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED event in the case when the new dynamic flag is
>> set?
>
> I have never said that.
No, I w
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:59:04PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 15:43, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> >> So the solution would be to not let the DSA layer send the
> >> SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED event in the case whe
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 16:09, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:59:04PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 15:43, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
>> >> So the solution would be to not let the DSA layer
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> I don't know if you have a solution in mind wrt the behaviour of the
> offloaded flag if it is not to do as it does now and let the bridge age
> out dynamic entries. That led me to conclude that this patch-set cannot
> use the offloade
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 18:07, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> Then, make DSA decide whether to handle the "added_by_user && !is_static"
> combination or not, based on the presence of the DSA_FDB_FLAG_DYNAMIC
> flag, which will be set in ds->supported_fdb_flags only for the mv88e6xxx
> driver.
Okay, s
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:34:44PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 18:07, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >
> > Then, make DSA decide whether to handle the "added_by_user && !is_static"
> > combination or not, based on the presence of the DSA_FDB_FLAG_DYNAMIC
> > flag, which will be
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 19:40, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 05:41:06PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:44, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> >> + $MZ $swp1 -c 1 -p 128 -t udp "sp=54321,dp=12345" \
>> >> + -a $mac -b `mac_get $h2` -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 -q
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> Not true, it reveals that I forgot to put it in the patch, that's all. As
> I cannot run several of these tests because of memory constraints I link
> the file to a copy in a rw area where I modify the list and just run one
> of the su
11 matches
Mail list logo
