Re: [Bridge] [Question] Any plan to write/update the bridge doc?

2023-04-24 Thread Hangbin Liu
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 17:25:08 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > > Maybe someone already has asked. The only official Linux bridge document I > > got is a very ancient wiki page[1] or the ip link man page[2][3]. As there > > are > > many bri

Re: [Bridge] [Question] Any plan to write/update the bridge doc?

2023-04-24 Thread Stephen Hemminger via Bridge
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:28:00 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 17:25:08 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > > Maybe someone already has asked. The only official Linux bridge document I > > got is a very ancient wiki page[1] or the ip link man page[2][3]. As there > > are > > many bridge s

Re: [Bridge] [Question] Any plan to write/update the bridge doc?

2023-04-24 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 17:25:08 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > Maybe someone already has asked. The only official Linux bridge document I > got is a very ancient wiki page[1] or the ip link man page[2][3]. As there are > many bridge stp/vlan/multicast paramegers. Should we add a detailed kernel > document

Re: [Bridge] [Question] Any plan to write/update the bridge doc?

2023-04-24 Thread Stephen Hemminger via Bridge
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 18:46:53 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 05:25:08PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Maybe someone already has asked. The only official Linux bridge document I > > got is a very ancient wiki page[1] or the ip link man page[2][3]. As there > > are

Re: [Bridge] [Question] Any plan to write/update the bridge doc?

2023-04-24 Thread Ido Schimmel via Bridge
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 05:25:08PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe someone already has asked. The only official Linux bridge document I > got is a very ancient wiki page[1] or the ip link man page[2][3]. As there are > many bridge stp/vlan/multicast paramegers. Should we add a detailed k

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries with "master dynamic"

2023-04-24 Thread Hans Schultz
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 15:26, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > Obviously we have not reached the end of that plan, and net-next is closed > now. Seems to me that net-next is open. Maybe it will close soon.

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries with "master dynamic"

2023-04-24 Thread Hans Schultz
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 15:26, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: >> I do not understand this patch. It seems to me that it basically blocks >> any future use of dynamic fdb entries from userspace towards drivers. >> >> I would have expected tha

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries with "master dynamic"

2023-04-24 Thread Vladimir Oltean
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: > I do not understand this patch. It seems to me that it basically blocks > any future use of dynamic fdb entries from userspace towards drivers. > > I would have expected that something would be done in the DSA layer, > where (switchco

[Bridge] [Question] Any plan to write/update the bridge doc?

2023-04-24 Thread Hangbin Liu
Hi, Maybe someone already has asked. The only official Linux bridge document I got is a very ancient wiki page[1] or the ip link man page[2][3]. As there are many bridge stp/vlan/multicast paramegers. Should we add a detailed kernel document about each parameter? The parameter showed in ip link pa