Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 00/14] sysctl: Add a size argument to register functions in sysctl

2023-08-07 Thread Luis Chamberlain
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 07:50:44PM -0700, Chris Maness wrote: > I tried running the current mainline kernel (current Arch Linux) with > simple single MUX socket (ax0) using LinFBB. I was a happy camper as > it seemed to work fine at first, then the system just slowed to a > crawl. I am wondering

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 00/14] sysctl: Add a size argument to register functions in sysctl

2023-08-07 Thread Luis Chamberlain
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 07:09:14PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 14:44:11 -0700 Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > This is looking great thanks, I've taken the first 7 patches above > > > to sysctl-next to get more exposure / testing and since we're already > > > on rc4. > > > >

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 00/14] sysctl: Add a size argument to register functions in sysctl

2023-08-07 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 14:44:11 -0700 Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > This is looking great thanks, I've taken the first 7 patches above > > to sysctl-next to get more exposure / testing and since we're already > > on rc4. > > Ok I havent't heard much more feedback from networking folks What did you

Re: [Bridge] Getting + maintaining a consistent MDB view in userspace?

2023-08-07 Thread Stephen Hemminger via Bridge
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 02:29:09 +0200 Linus Lüssing wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a recommended way to get and monitor the MDB state from > userspace, without potential synchronization races? > > I can use "bridge monitor mdb" to get changes or "bridge mdb show" > to get the current state (as well as

[Bridge] Getting + maintaining a consistent MDB view in userspace?

2023-08-07 Thread Linus Lüssing
Hi, Is there a recommended way to get and monitor the MDB state from userspace, without potential synchronization races? I can use "bridge monitor mdb" to get changes or "bridge mdb show" to get the current state (as well as use the underlying netlink calls from my own application without the

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 00/14] sysctl: Add a size argument to register functions in sysctl

2023-08-07 Thread Luis Chamberlain
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:00:49PM -0700, Chris Maness wrote: > When are these likely to hit the mainline release code? linux-next tomorrow. The first 7 patches are scheduled for mainline as they were merged + tested without any hiccups. These last few patches I'll wait and see. If nothing blows

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 00/14] sysctl: Add a size argument to register functions in sysctl

2023-08-07 Thread Luis Chamberlain
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:36:50PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > Joel Granados (14): > > sysctl: Prefer ctl_table_header in proc_sysctl > > sysctl: Use ctl_table_header in list_for_each_table_entry > > sysctl: Add ctl_table_size to ctl_table_header > > sysctl: Add size argument to