On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 22:33 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich vyase...@redhat.com
It looks like if you make two links uplink, bridging
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:33:33 +0200
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad
On 03/13/2013 04:33 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich vyase...@redhat.com
It looks
Allow a ports to be designated as uplink. Multiple ports
may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich vyase...@redhat.com
---
include/uapi/linux/if_link.h |1 +
net/bridge/br_netlink.c |2 ++
net/bridge/br_private.h |1 +
