Make it possible to change the port state in a given MSTI. This is
done through a new netlink interface, since the MSTIs are objects in
their own right. The proposed iproute2 interface would be:
bridge mst set dev msti state
Current states in all applicable MSTIs can also be dumped. The
pr
On 1 March 2022 11:03:14 CET, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>Make it possible to change the port state in a given MSTI. This is
>done through a new netlink interface, since the MSTIs are objects in
>their own right. The proposed iproute2 interface would be:
>
>bridge mst set dev msti state
>
>Cu
On 3/1/22 15:19, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 1 March 2022 11:03:14 CET, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
Make it possible to change the port state in a given MSTI. This is
done through a new netlink interface, since the MSTIs are objects in
their own right. The proposed iproute2 interface would be:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 00:19, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 1 March 2022 11:03:14 CET, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>>Make it possible to change the port state in a given MSTI. This is
>>done through a new netlink interface, since the MSTIs are objects in
>>their own right. The proposed iproute2 i
On 07/03/2022 17:00, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 00:19, Nikolay Aleksandrov
> wrote:
>> On 1 March 2022 11:03:14 CET, Tobias Waldekranz
>> wrote:
>>> Make it possible to change the port state in a given MSTI. This is
>>> done through a new netlink interface, since the MST
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 17:53, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 3/1/22 15:19, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 1 March 2022 11:03:14 CET, Tobias Waldekranz
>> wrote:
>>> Make it possible to change the port state in a given MSTI. This is
>>> done through a new netlink interface, since the MSTIs are objec
