On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:30:07PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > > For the set:
> > > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov
> >
> > Thanks! Will rebase, retest and
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:30:07PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > For the set:
> > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov
>
> Thanks! Will rebase, retest and submit v1
Shouldn't the version numbers be independent of the RFC/PATCH
desi
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:30:07PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> For the set:
> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov
Thanks! Will rebase, retest and submit v1
On 13/04/2023 12:58, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Background
> ==
>
> In order to minimize the flooding of ARP and ND messages in the VXLAN
> network, EVPN includes provisions [1] that allow participating VTEPs to
> suppress such messages in case they know the MAC-IP binding and can
> reply on be
Background
==
In order to minimize the flooding of ARP and ND messages in the VXLAN
network, EVPN includes provisions [1] that allow participating VTEPs to
suppress such messages in case they know the MAC-IP binding and can
reply on behalf of the remote host. In Linux, the above is impleme
