RE: [Bridge] PVST

2007-04-27 Thread Leigh Sharpe
>(I'm particularly referring to a 6.2.19-ish kernel, before the patches of the >last few days) Err, perhaps I actually mean 2.6.19-ish -Original Message- From: Leigh Sharpe Sent: Friday, 27 April 2007 2:53 PM To: shemminger Cc: bridge Subject: RE: [Bridge] PVST So,

RE: [Bridge] PVST

2007-04-26 Thread Leigh Sharpe
pe Cc: bridge Subject: Re: [Bridge] PVST On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:47:42 +1000 "Leigh Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > Does the current bridging code handle PVST properly, or just ordinary > STP? Ordinary, STP. The 2.6.22 kernel will have all the bits to run ST

Re: [Bridge] PVST

2007-04-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:47:42 +1000 "Leigh Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > Does the current bridging code handle PVST properly, or just ordinary > STP? Ordinary, STP. The 2.6.22 kernel will have all the bits to run STP in user mode, and there is a version of RSTP in userspace see:

[Bridge] PVST

2007-04-26 Thread Leigh Sharpe
Hi All, Does the current bridging code handle PVST properly, or just ordinary STP? Regards, Leigh Leigh Sharpe Network Systems Engineer Pacific Wireless Ph +61 3 9584 8966 Mob 0408 009 502 Helpdesk 1300 300 616 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] web www.pacificwireless.com.au