>(I'm particularly referring to a 6.2.19-ish kernel, before the patches of the
>last few days)
Err, perhaps I actually mean 2.6.19-ish
-Original Message-
From: Leigh Sharpe
Sent: Friday, 27 April 2007 2:53 PM
To: shemminger
Cc: bridge
Subject: RE: [Bridge] PVST
So,
pe
Cc: bridge
Subject: Re: [Bridge] PVST
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:47:42 +1000
"Leigh Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Does the current bridging code handle PVST properly, or just ordinary
> STP?
Ordinary, STP. The 2.6.22 kernel will have all the bits to run ST
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:47:42 +1000
"Leigh Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Does the current bridging code handle PVST properly, or just ordinary
> STP?
Ordinary, STP. The 2.6.22 kernel will have all the bits to run STP in
user mode, and there is a version of RSTP in userspace see:
Hi All,
Does the current bridging code handle PVST properly, or just ordinary
STP?
Regards,
Leigh
Leigh Sharpe
Network Systems Engineer
Pacific Wireless
Ph +61 3 9584 8966
Mob 0408 009 502
Helpdesk 1300 300 616
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web www.pacificwireless.com.au