Gary said:
Now if Russia, China, England and France got together with us could
we make Israel, Iran, Pakistan, India, and North Korea give up
their bombs?
That would be Britain or the United Kingdom. England doesn't have
any kind of overall political authority that could make such a
decision.
--
From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:22 PM 6/14/2004 -0500 The Fool wrote:
Simple. We send in the stealth Bombers / Fighters and bomb every single
suspected nuclear site with daisy cutters. It's the right thing to do.
Shrub is too cowardly and ignorant to the right thing.
And you
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:01:50 -0400, JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:29 PM 6/14/2004 -0230 Nick Lidster wrote:
I tend to agree with Gary on this one, Iran would back away rather quickly
if a coalition said to pack up the reactor and go home.
Uh what do you think the world is doing
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:29:31 -0230, Nick Lidster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I tend to agree with Gary on this one, Iran would back away rather quickly
if a coalition said to pack up the reactor and go home. Though the Fool
would be correct in saying that bombing all of the suspected sites is
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 02:55:49 -0500, The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:22 PM 6/14/2004 -0500 The Fool wrote:
Simple. We send in the stealth Bombers / Fighters and bomb every single
suspected nuclear site with daisy cutters. It's the right thing
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 03:27:17 -0500, Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:01:50 -0400, JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:29 PM 6/14/2004 -0230 Nick Lidster wrote:
I tend to agree with Gary on this one, Iran would back away rather quickly
if a coalition said to
On 15 Jun 2004, at 1:41 am, Julia Thompson wrote:
Gary Denton wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 23:24:06 -0500, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gary Denton wrote:
Hugo nominees:
1972: To Your Scattered Bodies Go by Philip José Farmer
The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Le Guin
Dragonquest by Anne
At 10:55 PM 6/14/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
I don't think you said that right. I am unaware of any Constitutional
provision against exclusionary and offensive speech on federal lands.
JDG - Something about defending your right to say it, Maru .
Come on John, you know that one of
At 05:12 AM 6/15/2004 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
Should be What has having no enemy in the world one-tenth as strong
militarily done for us, except to give some people twitchy fingers and
delusions of grandeur?
I suggest that you tell a bunch of New York City widows just how
all-powerful the United
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tytlal designed test
OK... I'm thinking of using this as a test at the Rousit Uplift Ceremony:
...
There are three cream pies on a table. Five meters away is another table.
Both tables have stacks of small towls, smaller than a pie. Anytime a towl is
used, another one
In a message dated 6/15/2004 5:28:42 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's an original answer. You have an infinite supply of towels. So
fill the space between the tables with enough towels to make a bridge
from one table to the other. Then slowly push all three
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:36:35 -0400, JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:12 AM 6/15/2004 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
Should be What has having no enemy in the world one-tenth as strong
militarily done for us, except to give some people twitchy fingers and
delusions of grandeur?
I suggest that
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:27:33 +0100, William T Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Jun 2004, at 1:41 am, Julia Thompson wrote:
Gary Denton wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 23:24:06 -0500, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gary Denton wrote:
Hugo nominees:
1972: To Your
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:13:02 -0500, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plus I married a guy who's read only 1 Le Guin novel, and that one is
it, and he likes it so much that he doesn't want to read any more Le
Guin for fear of disappointment. I keep telling him he really ought to
- Original Message -
From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: Request for Proposals
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:01:50 -0400, JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:29 PM 6/14/2004 -0230 Nick Lidster
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:23:33 -0400, JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the Club, Gary
I can definitely sympathize with how it feels to think that there may be
terrorists on your doorstep - say targetting your train into work or the
very large Train Station next door to your
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:10:09 -0500, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Other than
giving some people twitchy fingers and delusions of grandeur what does
having no enemy in the world being one tenth as strong as us done?
It has allowed us to be a lot firmer with right wing
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I've already figured out that the towels catch fire if they touch the
metal rims. Guess I'll have to add that they ignite if they hit the floor.
So it'll be better if I add a thin rubber ring to the edge of the rim, and
they'll get a shock if they touch any part of the
In a message dated 6/15/2004 10:05:56 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe I'm missing the rule against it, but couldn't they just stack the 3
pies on
top of each other and carry them over that way? It'd be a bit messy with
the
casters, but less so than the
- Original Message -
From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: Request for Proposals
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:10:09 -0500, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Other than
giving some
JDG wrote:
At 05:12 AM 6/15/2004 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
Should be What has having no enemy in the world one-tenth as strong
militarily done for us, except to give some people twitchy fingers and
delusions of grandeur?
I suggest that you tell a bunch of New York City widows just how
...and I didn't have to do a thing! Yahoo just
upgraded my account from 4-100MB storage. Wonder if
they're competing with Gmail (is that correct?)
recently launched.
Oh, dear...you know that phrase about 'expanding to
fill the space available?' - I hope I'll have more
sense than to let things
Slate's most excellent Dahlia Lithwick had a great article yesterday
explaining why in fact that US Supreme Court decision was not ducking
the issue, but in fact made the correct decision:
http://slate.msn.com/id/2102381/
Even if you believe the words
.
Wire, June 15).
***
http://www.unwire.org/UNWire/20040615/449_24907.asp
JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
http://science.nasa.gov/spaceweather/venustransit/gallery_08jun04_page9.htm
http://makeashorterlink.com/?X17162398
Every 17 years, a dozen states from Delaware to
Illinois are treated to a springtime emergence of the
Brood X (Magicicada septendecim) periodical cicadas.
The inch-and-one-half,
Gary Denton wrote
I don't know, I am a couple miles from a petrochemical plant
and never think about terrorists attacking it.
Some people just seem much more concerned with their own
safety, more willing to trade liberties for safety.
Just out of curiosity, do you have children?
Gary Nunn wrote:
Since the attacks on Sept 11, I have found consistently, that I am
infinitely more fearful of my children's safety than I am of my own.
Would I give up some liberties to ensure their safety? Absolutely.
Do you mean absolutely yes or absolutely no?
serious
I can think of
- Original Message -
From: iaamoac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional
Slate's most excellent Dahlia Lithwick had a great article yesterday
explaining why in fact that US Supreme
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 06:57:18PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Would I give up some liberties to ensure their safety? Absolutely.
But you do not have the right to give up OTHERS liberties for your (or
your children's) sake. Other's liberties are not yours to give up.
That's like saying you would
- Original Message -
From: Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: RE: Terrorism too close to home...
Gary Denton wrote
I don't know, I am a couple miles from a petrochemical plant
and never think
- Original Message -
From: Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: RE: Terrorism too close to home...
Gary Denton wrote
I don't know, I am a couple miles from a petrochemical plant
and never think
On 16 Jun 2004, at 1:26 am, Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: iaamoac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional
Slate's most excellent Dahlia Lithwick had a great article
, and a war to
end
al wars would be witnessed by a generation that has seen no great
conflict!
Iran is _*Already*_ Massing troops on the Iraq border for just that:
According to GOP Moonie Propagandist Newspaper / UPI:
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040615-055649-4707r.htm
Iran massing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Here's an original answer. You have an infinite supply of towels. So
fill the space between the tables with enough towels to make a bridge
from one table to the other. Then slowly push all three pies at once
along the bridge.
---David
...
Ok, I've already figured
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
Would I give up some liberties to ensure their safety? Absolutely.
Not me.
I will
Erik wrote
I want my liberties. Don't you go giving them away without my
permission.
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
OK, I know better than to post a non-specific remark like what I wrote
originally to this list.
The question of giving up liberties for safety is much like
- Original Message -
From: Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:50 PM
Subject: RE: Terrorism too close to home...
Conscientia non oboedientia honor est.
Honor is conscience, not obedience.
Actually, honor is not
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:50:50PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Would I pay all the money in a bank to ransom my children or sacrifice
someone else to save my children from imminent death? Yes I would.
No you would not. IT IS NOT YOUR MONEY TO GIVE AWAY.
--
Erik Reuter
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and I didn't have to do a thing! Yahoo just
upgraded my account from 4-100MB storage. Wonder if
they're competing with Gmail (is that correct?)
recently launched.
I hope hotmail feels the heat soon and does the same. This Zoot
account fills to 100%
In a message dated 6/15/2004 7:45:33 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, a closer reading shows that the problem is impossible:
OK
There are three cream pies on a table.
...
If any part of --the actual cream of the-- pie touches either table or the
ground
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:50:50PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Would I pay all the money in a bank to ransom my children
or sacrifice
someone else to save my children from imminent death? Yes I would.
Erik wrote
No you would not. IT IS NOT YOUR MONEY TO GIVE AWAY.
Just a guess,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:42:48PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:50:50PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Would I pay all the money in a bank to ransom my children
or sacrifice
someone else to save my children from imminent death? Yes I would.
Erik wrote
No
Gary Nunn wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:50:50PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Would I pay all the money in a bank to ransom my children
or sacrifice
someone else to save my children from imminent death? Yes I would.
Erik wrote
No you would not. IT IS NOT YOUR MONEY TO GIVE
JDG wrote:
Come on John, you know that one of the reasons for the bill of rights,
perhaps the preeminent reason, was to protect people that might
otherwise
be excluded by the majority. That's what separation of church and state
is all about.
But aren't you the first person to also mention that
In a message dated 6/15/2004 9:00:40 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Key lime every mountain.
IGH!
You, sir, need to be punished for that one!
Did you here the ISIRTA one where the unused southern german flour mills were
going to be used as kennels?
The
William wrote:
If this was the only similar case in the pipeline then fair enough. But
with such an egregious violation that seems surprising. Again, if it
was the only such case, fair enough. But otherwise why pick this one
which can be eliminated on a technicality?
Presumably any other similar
At 09:36 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
Because it is on U.S. Government property it isn't the VFW's speech that
is in question. Because it is on U.S. government property is the U.S.
Government's speech. The VFW doesn't figure at all in the decision, their
involvement is completely,
- Original Message -
From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional
At 09:36 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
Because it is on U.S. Government property it isn't the
At 11:45 PM 6/12/2004 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote:
JDG wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote:
--===1385683643==
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level while
I was gone.
At 10:40 PM 6/5/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
Get a grip, John, it's just a dumb joke.
Yes, but I think that it is worth noting that jokes can tell a lot about
ones attitude.Personally, when I am around friends of mixed political
persuasions, I generally avoid partisan jokes. I'll freely
At 09:56 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
Another reason is that an awful lot of Americans just don't get
separation of church and state and are aghast at the idea that the
government shouldn't be able to endorse religion.
In large part that probably has to do with the fact that the
JDG wrote:
At 09:36 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
Because it is on U.S. Government property it isn't the VFW's speech that
is in question. Because it is on U.S. government property is the U.S.
Government's speech. The VFW doesn't figure at all in the decision,
their
involvement is
At 12:09 AM 6/16/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote:
The VFW often burns flags John. :-)
You caught me!
Still, even if the VFW were unceremoniously burning flags in Mojave, I
think that they'd probably have a lot more support on Brin-L than they have
received for memorializing our First World War
At 11:17 AM 6/15/2004 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
I don't know, I am a couple miles from a petrochemical plant and never
think about terrorists attacking it.
Then again, you've probably never watched an airplane crash into an office
building ten miles away from your present location on TV, and then
At 10:16 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
JDG wrote:
At 09:36 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
Because it is on U.S. Government property it isn't the VFW's speech that
is in question. Because it is on U.S. government property is the U.S.
Government's speech. The VFW doesn't
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:17:32 -0400, JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:09 AM 6/16/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote:
The VFW often burns flags John. :-)
You caught me!
Still, even if the VFW were unceremoniously burning flags in Mojave, I
think that they'd probably have a lot more support on Brin-L
56 matches
Mail list logo
