> From: Dan Minette
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2006 2:39 PM
> >
> > The Security Council was the five major powers of the Allies
> > after WWII.
> > France was in there as a gift from the US. At the time, only
> > the US had
> > nuclear weapons. Also, at that time, the only significant
> >
> From: Robert Seeberger
> Sent: Monday, 16 January 2006 11:33 AM
>
> It may be that the ease with which the US swatted Iraq down surprised
> much of the developing world (especially after the fiasco in
> Sudan and
> other similar events where the US was attacked) and the idea that the
> U
> From: Dan Minette
>
>
>
>
> >> Given that, it's unlikely for a politician to say "the
> >> Constitution is just a piece of paper." It's much more
> >> likely that they would say "that's not what it means" even if
> >> it is clear to everyone else that's what it means.
>
>
> >Dan, I find
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Nuclear Iran
> I think too North Korea plays into this somewhat.
> They had nukes, were part of the Axis of Evil, and were not invaded.
> Iraq
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:58 PM
Subject: RE: Nuclear Iran
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Minette
> Sent: Wednesday, 18
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:17 PM
Subject: RE: Technique
>> Given that, it's unlikely for a politician to say "the
>> Constitution is just a piece of paper." It's much more
>> likely that t
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 08:44 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>> I've been ill today and have not
>> watched or read news today.
>
>
>
> Similarly here.
>
>
>
>> xponent
>> Recurring Infection Maru
>
>
> How long for you? Mine was 24 years at Thanksgiving.
>
Two weeks at the mo
At 04:07 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, Deborah Harrell wrote:
> Matt Grimaldi (aka EvilTopPoster ) wrote:
> Congratuations!
Damon (the soon-to-be-perpetually-sleep-deprived)
wrote:
> As a new daddy (my kid was born on 1.6.06) it's a
> pretty great feeling...
Hup, Hup, Huzzah!
Name? Weight? Etc.?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Minette
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2006 1:21 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Nuclear Iran
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Russell Chapman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
At 08:44 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I've been ill today and have not
watched or read news today.
Similarly here.
xponent
Recurring Infection Maru
How long for you? Mine was 24 years at Thanksgiving.
Getting Rather Sick And Tired Of Being Sick And Tired Maru
--Ro
Dan Minette wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
> Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Technique
>
> Bush is arguing for a strong executive interpretation of the
> Constitution. But, when the Supreme
At 07:25 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/16/2006 4:56:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
somebody other than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Somewhere I've heard that the biological drive to procreate can only
> >> be completely satisfied by grandchildren. :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Chapman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Nuclear Iran
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> >We (the international community) can always resort to a MAD-like
> >position to enforce anti-proli
> Dan Minette
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2006 1:03 PM
>
> Given that, it's unlikely for a politician to say "the
> Constitution is just a piece of paper." It's much more
> likely that they would say "that's not what it means" even if
> it is clear to everyone else that's what it means
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Technique
>
> Is there any evidence that politicos sub-universally have the kind of
> respect for the Constitution that you are implying?
>
In a message dated 1/16/2006 4:56:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Somewhere I've heard that the biological drive to procreate can only
> >> be completely satisfied by grandchildren. :-) I have quite a few
> >>years
> >> to wait before first-hand experience.
> >>
>
There
At 12:16 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like members of a
cult :)
Hee!
So is this your new Cause then?
Just expanding my hobby of ra
http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue456/news.html
SCI FI Channel announced Jan. 12 that it will air the first season of
the BBC's hit SF series Doctor Who, starting in March. The 13
episodes, starring Christopher Eccleston as the Doctor and Billie
Piper as Rose Tyler, will air as part of SCI FI Frid
> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the people on this list are all that
> misled (as compared
> to the population in general). IMO it is "single
> issue politics" that
> has gotten us in the situation we are in, and it
> plays on both sides.
> This "follow the leader
> Matt Grimaldi (aka EvilTopPoster ) wrote:
> Congratuations!
Damon (the soon-to-be-perpetually-sleep-deprived)
wrote:
> As a new daddy (my kid was born on 1.6.06) it's a
> pretty great feeling...
Hup, Hup, Huzzah!
Name? Weight? Etc.?
Not-news flash: not having children does not mean that
On 17 Jan 2006, at 5:51 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 8:13 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who
have >decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated
with not h
>
>> William wrote:
>>
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated with
not having children."
>>
>>
>> Doug wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, having children can be extremely stressfull, but I can h
William T Goodall wrote:
On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like members of a
cult :)
Hee!
So is this your new Cause then?
Just expanding my hobby of railing at human idiocies into a new area...
And I'm
William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 6:54 pm, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility associated
with
not having children."
Doug wrote:
Hmmm, having child
William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 8:13 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
>decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility associated
with not having children."
This just in: living only for your
Doug Pensinger wrote:
On wrote:
I dunno. Here's some possibilities, though:
Because there's more to life than a low stress level?
Not much.
Life*zero stress=zero life
8^)
I don't know about that formula. By that formula, the more stress you
have, the better your life. I would arg
On 17 Jan 2006, at 12:53 pm, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
And I'm sure there's a connection between the evil poisonous
filth of
religion and the pointless self-harm of procreation somewhere :)
You can always start by checking out the correlation between
atheism and
child-free cou
Ritu wrote:
>So is this your new Cause then?
The capital "c" was a nice touch. Should we call him "William the
Crusader" from now on? It has a nice, epic ring to it. Parents,
Christians and Saracens beware, for William the Crusader comes!!! ;-)
Jim
William T Goodall wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
>
> >
> > William T Goodall wrote:
> >> Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like
> members of a
> >> cult :)
> >
> > Hee!
> >
> > So is this your new Cause then?
>
> Just expanding my hobby of railing at human id
On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like members of a
cult :)
Hee!
So is this your new Cause then?
Just expanding my hobby of railing at human idiocies into a new area...
And I'm sure there's a connection bet
30 matches
Mail list logo
