Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-23 Thread Ray Ludenia
Julia Thompson wrote: > Actually, in all seriousness, what are the percentages of left-handed > people and right-handed people on the list? And ambidexterous? Back of the envelope calculation: Approx 200 out of 6 billion is 0.03% for each of your categories. > I'm curious. Anyone have a g

the dexterous spectrum (was: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment))

2004-02-22 Thread Ticia
Julia Thompson wrote: Actually, in all seriousness, what are the percentages of left-handed people and right-handed people on the list? And ambidexterous? I'm curious. Anyone have a good method for getting the data? I'm ambi (of course) Ticia ',:) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-22 Thread Julia Thompson
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike Lee wrote: > >Nerd from Hell confessed: > > > > > If I can get one for being a pure "Left-handed" person... > > > Any other "lefties" out there? > > > >No, there aren't. You're the last one. Thank God. > > And as soon as we hunt him down and

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic] Amendment)

2004-02-22 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike Lee wrote: Nerd from Hell confessed: > If I can get one for being a pure "Left-handed" person... > Any other "lefties" out there? No, there aren't. You're the last one. Thank God. And as soon as we hunt him down and kill him, the list will be free of his sinister influ

RE: Brin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-20 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:53 PM 2/19/04, Deborah Harrell wrote: > "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't really think anyone was keeping a chart, > but... me, I'm poly, transgendered, "sapiosexual," > with no children - fit THAT into your categories, > Debbi ^_^ Umm, I think it's safe to say th

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-20 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:28 AM 2/19/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: "Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:45 PM Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment) > >

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 02:14 PM 2/18/04, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the outer limits of t

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:38:08 -0600 At 06:13 PM 2/18/04,

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 06:13 PM 2/18/04, William T Goodall wrote: On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Heard about it her

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread William T Goodall
On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Heard about it here. ";" should have been "or" :) -- William T G

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronn!Blankenship > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 02:04 PM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal > Marriage[sic]Amendment) >

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 02:14 PM 2/18/04, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the outer limits of the spectrum are represente

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Won't Even Make The Usual Observation About Assuming Maru -- Ronn! :) __

Re: Totally Gay: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic] Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 06:04 PM 2/17/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I ask what GLBT stands for, Garlic, lettuce, bacon, and tomato. -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l