subject:"He's dead, Jim. Now what\?"

RE: He's dead, Jim. Now what?

2007-05-03 Thread Ronn! Blankenship

At 07:26 AM Thursday 5/3/2007, Jim Sharkey wrote: >Ronn! Blankenship queried: > >That when the message came back here on the list it was entirely > >blank the first two times, which is why I re-sent it. Did you get > >any content the first two times? > >Yep. All three posts I received had everyth

RE: He's dead, Jim. Now what?

2007-05-03 Thread Jim Sharkey

Ronn! Blankenship queried: >That when the message came back here on the list it was entirely >blank the first two times, which is why I re-sent it. Did you get >any content the first two times? Yep. All three posts I received had everything in them. Jim

RE: He's dead, Jim. Now what?

2007-05-02 Thread Ronn! Blankenship

At 10:04 AM Wednesday 5/2/2007, Jim Sharkey wrote: >Ronn! Blankenship wrote: > >(This is peculiar. Hope it works this time.) > >Which part? The triple post or the link? :-p That when the message came back here on the list it was entirely blank the first two times, which is why I re-sent it.

RE: He's dead, Jim. Now what?

2007-05-02 Thread Jim Sharkey

Ronn! Blankenship wrote: >(This is peculiar. Hope it works this time.) Which part? The triple post or the link? :-p Jim I'm a doctor, not a bricklayer Maru ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!