Re: Is it hot in here?

On Tue,  4 May 2004 20:51:28 -0400 (EDT), Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Seeberger wrote: No turtles?! No elephants either! And without them, our fat mines will run dry! Jim Fifth Elephant Maru Don't worry, our Prez Cheney has a plan. Gary disappointed in Monstrous

Re: Is it hot in here?

At 07:58 PM 5/3/04, Dan Minette wrote: 2) There is nothing underlying physics. Which explains the Gahan Wilson cartoon Is Nothing Sacred? -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Is it hot in here?

No turtles all the way down? Damn, I might as well go back to believing that the universe is one wave particle string looped a google times in time. This is restating Bach's theory of One. That was an easy question about clowns,. they are drunk, the glass is slippery. What about gravity, if

Re: Is it hot in here?

- Original Message - From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 5:06 AM Subject: Re: Is it hot in here? That was an easy question about clowns,. they are drunk, the glass is slippery. Yeah, but they have those really

Re: Is it hot in here?

Robert Seeberger wrote: No turtles?! No elephants either! And without them, our fat mines will run dry! Jim Fifth Elephant Maru ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!

Re: Is it hot in here?

- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:48 PM Subject: Re: Is it hot in here? In a message dated 5/3/2004 7:27:56 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan Minette wrote: 2) There is nothing underlying

Re: Is it hot in here?

- Original Message - From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Is it hot in here? At 09:27 AM 4/28/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: Science is not all cut and dry. There are a number of global climate

Re: Is it hot in here?

Dan Minette wrote: 2) There is nothing underlying physics. No turtles?! -- Nick Arnett Director, Business Intelligence Services LiveWorld Inc. Phone/fax: (408) 551-0427 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Is it hot in here?

In a message dated 5/3/2004 7:27:56 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan Minette wrote: 2) There is nothing underlying physics. No turtles?! No elephants either! G And no corks! Vilyehm ___

Re: Is it hot in here?

- Original Message - From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 8:21 PM Subject: Re: Is it hot in here? Dan Minette wrote: 2) There is nothing underlying physics. No turtles?! No elephants either! G xponent

Re: Is it hot in here?

At 09:27 AM 4/28/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: Science is not all cut and dry. There are a number of global climate models, that have uncertainties in them. Global warming hawks tend to favor models that discuss about 3-4C increases in global temperature due to human activity over the next

Re: Is it hot in here?

At 09:33 AM 5/1/04, JDG wrote: At 09:27 AM 4/28/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: Science is not all cut and dry. There are a number of global climate models, that have uncertainties in them. Global warming hawks tend to favor models that discuss about 3-4C increases in global temperature due to

Is it hot in here?

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20040426-090538-2682r.htm A feverish fate for scientific truth? Some things are sacred to scientists: Facts, data, quantitative analysis, and Nature magazine, long recognized as the world's most prestigious science periodical. Lately, many have begun to

Re: Is it hot in here?

-- From: Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20040426-090538-2682r.htm Washinton Times: Sugar Daddy Moons Personal Propaganda outlet. A feverish fate for scientific truth? Lately, many have begun to wonder if Jayson Blair has a new job as