Re: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-03-02 Thread Robert J. Chassell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But of course they must have something (or many things) that they do not want inspectors to find. That is the problem with the inspection game. It is only a problem if the host country does try to hide something. If the host country is trying to prove its inn

Re: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-03-02 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 3/2/2003 7:27:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > As far as I know, nobody's actually shown Iraq still *has* > anthrax. But of course they must have something (or many things) that they do not want inspectors to find. That is the problem with the inspecti

Re: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-03-02 Thread Paul Walker
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:48:01PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote: > Has Iraq turned over its anthrax? nerve agents? As far as I know, nobody's actually shown Iraq still *has* anthrax. -- Paul > I need some good links about ip spoffing . So, you need some good herking sites so you can become a

RE: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-03-01 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:44 PM 3/1/03 +, Jose J. Ortiz-Carlo wrote: From: "Gary L. Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't disagree with you at all. But I think that Saddam is winning the propaganda campaign in this war. Marketing and perception are powerful tools in this war as evident by the position of countries t

RE: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-03-01 Thread Jose J. Ortiz-Carlo
From: "Gary L. Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't disagree with you at all. But I think that Saddam is winning the propaganda campaign in this war. Marketing and perception are powerful tools in this war as evident by the position of countries that are normally our allies. Which will take Saddam n

RE: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-02-28 Thread Gary L. Nunn
> > At 06:48 PM 2/27/2003 -0500 Gary L. Nunn wrote: > >Right or wrong, good or bad, if GWB attacks Iraq now, he is going to > >make the US look like a bully. John wrote > How's that? > Has Iraq turned over its anthrax? nerve agents? > Has Iraq fully disclosed its nerve programs? > The fac

Re: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-02-28 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 06:48 PM 2/27/2003 -0500 Gary L. Nunn wrote: >Right or wrong, good or bad, if GWB attacks Iraq now, he is going to >make the US look like a bully. How's that? Has Iraq turned over its anthrax? nerve agents? Has Iraq fully disclosed its nerve programs? The fact that destruction of these mis

Re: Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-02-28 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 18:48 27-2-2003 -0500, Gary Nunn wrote: Right or wrong, good or bad, if GWB attacks Iraq now, he is going to make the US look like a bully. And that is a departure from America's current reputation -- how exactly? Jeroen "Political Observations" van Baardwijk _

Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles

2003-02-27 Thread Gary L. Nunn
> > Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com > > Official: Iraq Agrees to Destroy Missiles Right or wrong, good or bad, if GWB attacks Iraq now, he is going to make the US look like a bully. Gary Tread carefully maru ___ http://www.mccmedia