At 08:22 PM 12/18/2002 -0600 Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
>According to labor statistics, productivity for American workers
>continues to climb. I can understand how that is measured for
>industries in which there is a measurable *thing* produced, such as
>cars or toasters, but how do those statistics
Lalith Vipulananthan wrote:
Embarassingly enough, I knew about both of those already, but the word looked
made up. Silly me for such a strange assumption.
Lal
GSV I Blame The Culture List
And not your Xompitor?
Doug
Or however you spell it.
__
"Ronn! Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 09:36 PM 12/18/02 -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
> >Everything is fungible to an economist or a finance guy.
>
> Please! Watch your language!
OK, what was the problem word, "fungible" or "economist"? ;)
Julia
___
--- Ronn! Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
> >Everything is fungible to an economist or a finance
> guy.
>
>
> Please! Watch your language!
Don't you like mushrooms? Pretty tasty sauteed with
shallots and leeks in a white wine sauce, on the side
of mesquite-grilled f
Jon wrote:
> > > Forget all that other technical stuff! What does 'fungible' mean?!
> >
> >Interchangeable. Is it easier for you to post a question like that
> >rather than surf to something like http://dictionary.com/ and find the
> >answer?
> >
> >
>
> Well, he might not know about it?
>
> Lal,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> > > Forget all that other technical stuff! What does 'fungible' mean?!
> >
> >Interchangeable. Is it easier for you to post a question like that
> >rather than surf to something like http://dictionary.com/ and find the
> >answer?
>
> Well, he might not kn
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question for JDG (or anyone else with a good answer)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:13:02 -0500
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 06:46:55PM -, Lalith Vipulananthan wrote:
> Erik wrote:
>
> From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Other than that, lines of code per coder per month might tell you
> something, maybe. Of course, you have to average that over the
lifetime
It's something very close to ~ 3 lines code / Day.
___
http://www.m
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 06:46:55PM -, Lalith Vipulananthan wrote:
> Erik wrote:
>
> > working towards it). That thing is money = revenue =
> > sales. Everything is fungible to an economist or a finance guy. So,
> > to first order, I
>
> Forget all that other technical stuff! What does 'fungibl
Erik wrote:
> working towards it). That thing is money = revenue = sales. Everything
> is fungible to an economist or a finance guy. So, to first order, I
Forget all that other technical stuff! What does 'fungible' mean?!
Lal
GSV Confused
___
http://w
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Ronn!Blankenship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 19 december 2002 8:03
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: Question for JDG (or anyone else with a good answer)
> Thereby confirming what everybody knows: that go
At 10:51 PM 12/18/02 -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
The business sector comprises
about 80 percent of GDP since it must exclude those portions of the
economy for which productivity measures cannot be constructed. General
government [
is] excluded.
Thereby confirming what everybody knows: that gov
At 09:36 PM 12/18/02 -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
Everything is fungible to an economist or a finance guy.
Please! Watch your language!
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle
_
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 09:19:07PM -0600, Steve Sloan II wrote:
> Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
>
> >According to labor statistics, productivity for American
> >workers continues to climb. I can understand how that
> >is measured for industries in which there is a measurable
> >*thing* produced, such a
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 09:36:16PM -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
> My first reaction is -- every company produces a measurable thing (or is
> working towards it). That thing is money = revenue = sales. Everything
> is fungible to an economist or a finance guy. So, to first order, I
> would think produc
Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
According to labor statistics, productivity for American
workers continues to climb. I can understand how that
is measured for industries in which there is a measurable
*thing* produced, such as cars or toasters, but how do
those statistics get determined for nontangibles
>Adam wrote-
>According to labor statistics, productivity for American workers
>continues to climb. I can understand how that is measured for
>industries in which there is a measurable *thing* produced, such as
>cars or toasters, but how do those statistics get determined for
>nontangibles? Let
"Adam C. Lipscomb" wrote:
>
> According to labor statistics, productivity for American workers
> continues to climb. I can understand how that is measured for
> industries in which there is a measurable *thing* produced, such as
> cars or toasters, but how do those statistics get determined for
>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:22:30PM -0600, Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
> According to labor statistics, productivity for American workers
> continues to climb. I can understand how that is measured for
> industries in which there is a measurable *thing* produced, such as
> cars or toasters, but how do
According to labor statistics, productivity for American workers
continues to climb. I can understand how that is measured for
industries in which there is a measurable *thing* produced, such as
cars or toasters, but how do those statistics get determined for
nontangibles? Let's look at, say, sof
20 matches
Mail list logo
