Re: Intent and language

2003-08-02 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:08 PM Subject: Re: Intent and language On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:21:49PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: I have gone over your posts to make sure my memory

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-02 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 12:17:24PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: You mean did I miss the fact that you were playing the look at me, I'm so clever, I'm mocking someone with their own words game? What happened to I'll be happy to assume good intentions? No, I just considered that of secondary

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-02 Thread Julia Thompson
Dan Minette wrote: ORIFLAMME. ORIFLAMME? OK, I know that my mind is being dissolved by so many hormones and so many other things to think about (such as pending lactation), but I can't figure this one out even with some effort. Julia ___

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-02 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 12:57 PM Subject: Re: Intent and language Dan Minette wrote: ORIFLAMME. ORIFLAMME? OK, I know that my mind is being dissolved by so many

RE: Intent and language

2003-08-02 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julia Thompson Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 1:58 PM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: Intent and language Dan Minette wrote: ORIFLAMME. ORIFLAMME? OK, I know that my mind is being dissolved by so many hormones

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-01 Thread Erik Reuter
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:21:49PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: I have gone over your posts to make sure my memory wasn't faulty, and I do see a great number of you ...some negative statements. Things like you think wrong, you have let yourself fall in a trap, etc. It appears that you are now

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:08 PM Subject: Re: Intent and language irony As for the rest of the comments that were written in the message I am replying to, I, like David Brin

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-01 Thread Erik Reuter
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:10:18PM -0500, Robert Seeberger wrote: I think the real irony is that you have just proven me prescient at best, or insightful at the very least. I think that's more leady than irony, actually. -- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-01 Thread Erik Reuter
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:03:56PM -0500, Robert Seeberger wrote: From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that's more leady than irony, actually. Mercurial even! And the next thing to say is Thallium's odd!. But if we keep going on and on like this, eventually it could get

Re: Intent and language

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:01 PM Subject: Re: Intent and language On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:03:56PM -0500, Robert Seeberger wrote: From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] I