* J. van Baardwijk [Wed, 02/04/2003 at 22:58 +0200]
> At 17:29 02-04-03 +0100, William Goodall wrote:
>
> >>It's the money, really. The 256/64 Kb package is considerably cheaper
> >>than cable, and other packages (512/256 and better) are all more
> >>expensive than cable. Cable costs EUR 49.95 p
At 10:29 02-04-03 +0200, I wrote:
> > Can't compare ADSL vs. cable speed, BTW -- Chello doesn't provide
> > information about their connection speed. But hey, if the ADSL
> > package I got turns out to be too slow, I can always upgrade.
>
> Ahh, that's right - ADSL services around me also offer di
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 09:58 pm, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
At 17:29 02-04-03 +0100, William Goodall wrote:
I pay (about) €36 (£24.99) per month for 512/256 ADSL
Over here that would cost EUR 50 to 55 per month.
at 50:1 contention.
At 50:1 WHAT? I'm not familiar with that term; please ex
On 2 Apr 2003 at 22:43, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 07:36 pm, Andrew Crystall wrote:
>
> > On 2 Apr 2003 at 17:29, William T Goodall wrote:
> >>
> >> I pay (about) 36 (£24.99) per month for 512/256 ADSL at 50:1
> >> contention. I haven't noticed any issues with
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 07:36 pm, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 2 Apr 2003 at 17:29, William T Goodall wrote:
I pay (about) €36 (£24.99) per month for 512/256 ADSL at 50:1
contention. I haven't noticed any issues with contention though - I
seem to get my full bandwidth all the time.
UK ADSL
At 17:29 02-04-03 +0100, William Goodall wrote:
It's the money, really. The 256/64 Kb package is considerably cheaper
than cable, and other packages (512/256 and better) are all more
expensive than cable. Cable costs EUR 49.95 per month, which I find to be
a bit (too) much for what I use Intern
On 2 Apr 2003 at 17:29, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 10:58 pm, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
>
> > At 15:20 01-04-03 -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
> >> Ouch! Why is it so much slower? ADSL near me is very competitive
> >> with cable internet speeds, and often considered supe
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 10:58 pm, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
At 15:20 01-04-03 -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
Ouch! Why is it so much slower? ADSL near me is very competitive
with cable internet speeds, and often considered superior.
It's the money, really. The 256/64 Kb package is considerably
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Bryon Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: woensdag 2 april 2003 1:37
> Aan: Killer Bs Discussion
> Onderwerp: Re: New Computer But Still Not Happy
> > Can't compare ADSL vs. cable speed, BTW -- Chello doesn't prov
"J. van Baardwijk" wrote:
> At 15:20 01-04-03 -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
>
> > > Two new toys, actually: a few days earlier Sonja gave me a digital
> > > photo camera for my birthday... :-)
> >
> >No birthday, here, but I just bought a digital camera also (to use for our
> >baby's imminent arrival
At 15:20 01-04-03 -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
> Two new toys, actually: a few days earlier Sonja gave me a digital
> photo camera for my birthday... :-)
No birthday, here, but I just bought a digital camera also (to use for our
baby's imminent arrival)... anyway, what'd ya get?
HP 720 (3.3 megapix
"J. van Baardwijk" wrote:
> The good part first: bought a new computer last Wednesday. Real nice stuff:
> P4 2.6 GHz processor, 512 MB RAM, 120 GB harddisk, 128 MB video card,
> CD/DVD ROM drive, CD-RW/DVD-RW burner, TV/Radio receiver, and connections
> for literally *anything* that can nowadays b
12 matches
Mail list logo
