At 11:21 AM 11/5/2002 +0530 Ritu Ko wrote:
>No more credit than the world gave other countries for not provoking an
>unnecessary war in an unprecedentedly irrational manner, no.
>
>Is the US *looking* for more credit than that?
Actually, I think that the US is simply looking for an end to the
trum
At 09:59 AM 11/5/2002 -0200 Alberto Monteiro wrote:
>But if you count the largest democracy by the number
>of direct votes given to the President, then the title
>does not belong to India, but to Brazil :-P
Actually, Lula's vote total is only the second-largest for a Presidential
candidate in
Horn, John wrote:
From: Russell Chapman [mailto:rchapman@;ozemail.com.au]
/8qT5dS: Permission denied
Huh?
- jmh
Confused...
Not as much as me. I posted using the same email address I have for the
last 6 years or so, but from a different SMTP server. I expected to
either see my post on t
> From: Russell Chapman [mailto:rchapman@;ozemail.com.au]
>
> /8qT5dS: Permission denied
Huh?
- jmh
Confused...
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:20:34PM +1100, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>
>> Erik Reuter wrote:
>>
>>> One person's emoticon is another's trampoline, I always say ;)
>>
>> You do? I have never heard you say this before. Can you cite some
>> examples? Maybe I'm deaf or haven't been pa
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:20:34PM +1100, Ray Ludenia wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> > One person's emoticon is another's trampoline, I always say ;)
>
> You do? I have never heard you say this before. Can you cite some
> examples? Maybe I'm deaf or haven't been paying attention.
Cite, deaf? Ma
Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:05:35PM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
>
>> Erik Reuter wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't it ironic that the world's largest democracy treats every
>>> else's concerns as a joke? ;)
Touchy! One Indian poster *possibly* does this and you generalise this to a
billion Ind
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: US Unilateralism
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ritu K
Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ritu Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:49 AM
> Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
>
> > Robert Seeberger wrote:
> >
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Alberto Monteiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: US Unilateralism
> Erik Reuter wrote:
> >
> >> But if you count the largest democracy by the number of
- Original Message -
From: "Ritu Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:49 AM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> > > > With that being said, has anybody noticed that the Unite
--- Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> Ritu Ko wrote:
>
> > Well, the meaning was clear in any case. But the
> problem is that I don't
> > see how I could have changed the way it was
> perceived. I mean, I know
> > why I wrote the above comment, I included a ''
> and ':)' to indicate I was joking
- Original Message -
From: "Alberto Monteiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: US Unilateralism
>
> Jim Sharkey wrote:
> >
> >> Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical
Jim Sharkey wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian
>> girl would have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse
>> (3), bellybutton piercing (4), necklace (5), wristlaces (6)
>> and (7), anklelaces (8) and (9), ... Hmmm... Maybe it's
>> a fair criterium
>
>Since wh
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
> > No, it should be
> > one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
> > :-)
> >
> Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian
> girl would have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse
> (3), bellybutton piercing (4), neck
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Grimaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: US Unilateralism
> "John D. Giorgis" wrote:
> >
> > I know that the US, especially under the curr
- Original Message -
From: "Ritu Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:24 AM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
>
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > Why I can see being opposed to attacking Iraq, I'm rather
>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:26:38AM -0800, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
> All of this negotiation, etc. should have taken place or at least been
> wrapping up before the President made it a public issue.
Absolutely not. Lots of secret negotiations behind closed doors that the
citizens don't know about? No
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> I know that the US, especially under the current Administration, is
> often-criticized for having unilateralist tendencies, and disregarding the
> opinions of the international community.
>
> With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United States has now
> l
- Original Message -
From: "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
> You want US unilateralism. I'll give you US unilateralism:
>
> In the immortal words of R
You want US unilateralism. I'll give you US unilateralism:
In the immortal words of Randy Newman:
"Political Science"
No one likes us
I don't know why.
We may not be perfect
But heaven knows we try.
But all around even our old friends put us down.
Let's drop the big one and see what happen
In a message dated 11/5/2002 6:29:23 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
OK, I just got an image of Jeanne Kirkpatrick naked.
You bastard, I'm coming to kill you for that.
>>
See Richard Baker for the cost of the ammunition.
And it was Alberto Monteiro who first me
In a message dated 11/5/2002 6:22:43 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< The UNSC might actually work better with the men drunk and the females
> naked.
Ah, the old Yeltsin-Clinton approach to statesmanship!
Rich
VFP Cheap Shot >>
Have you priced the cost of ammun
At 22:22 04-11-2002 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
I know that the US, especially under the current Administration, is
often-criticized for having unilateralist tendencies, and disregarding the
opinions of the international community.
With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United States
William wrote:
> The UNSC might actually work better with the men drunk and the
females naked.
OK, I just got an image of Jeanne Kirkpatrick naked.
You bastard, I'm coming to kill you for that.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Silence. I am watching television." - Spider Jerusalem
In a message dated 11/5/02 5:39:35 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Nope, I think that's unfair. It ought to be one vote for a certain
amount of fabric used in dress.
Ritu
GSV 5 Yards To A Saree >>
**buzzer**
Saree, your answer is Sarong.
William Taylor
-
William said:
> The UNSC might actually work better with the men drunk and the females
> naked.
Ah, the old Yeltsin-Clinton approach to statesmanship!
Rich
VFP Cheap Shot
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
In a message dated 11/5/02 5:06:06 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< > But if you count the largest democracy by the number of direct votes
> given to the President, then the title does not belong to India, but
> to Brazil :-P
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:05:35PM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> > Isn't it ironic that the world's largest democracy treats every
> > else's concerns as a joke? ;)
>
>
>
> Imo, the world ought to be grateful. Look at the mess we have made of
> handling our own serious concerns.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:35:33AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
> Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian girl would
> have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse (3), bellybutton
> piercing (4), necklace (5), wristlaces (6) and (7), anklelaces (8)
> and (9), ..
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:56:49PM +1000, Russell Chapman wrote:
> /8qT5dS: Permission denied
Ding!
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
/8qT5dS: Permission denied
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
> > No, it should be
> > one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
> > :-)
> >
> Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian
> girl would have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse
> (3), bellybutton piercing (4), necklace (5), wristlace
Erik Reuter wrote:
>
>> Why one-country-one-vote? This is stupid, companheiro.
>> It should be one-working-class-one-vote. There would be
>
> No, it should be
> one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
> :-)
>
Hmmm... Let me see how many votes
Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:21:53AM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
>
> > No more credit than the world gave other countries for not provoking
> > an unnecessary war in an unprecedentedly irrational manner, no.
>
> Interesting terminology there, Ritu, but I guess to be expected.
Ok
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:19:45AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
> Why one-country-one-vote? This is stupid, companheiro. It should be
> one-working-class-one-vote. There would be
No, it should be one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
:-)
--
"E
Erik Reuter wrote:
>
>> But if you count the largest democracy by the number of
>> direct votes given to the President, then the title
>> does not belong to India, but to Brazil :-P
>
>
> Great, next thing you know you'll be wanting v
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:59:48AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
> But if you count the largest democracy by the number of direct votes
> given to the President, then the title does not belong to India, but
> to Brazil :-P
Great, next
Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> Interesting terminology there, Ritu, but I guess to be
> expected. Isn't it ironic that the world's largest
> democracy treats every else's concerns as a joke? ;)
>
Does India treat every else's concerns as a joke?
But if you count the largest democracy by the numb
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:21:53AM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
> No more credit than the world gave other countries for not provoking
> an unnecessary war in an unprecedentedly irrational manner, no.
Interesting terminology there, Ritu, but I guess to be expected. Isn't
it ironic that the world's large
Ritu Ko wrote:
> Well, the meaning was clear in any case. But the problem is that I don't
> see how I could have changed the way it was perceived. I mean, I know
> why I wrote the above comment, I included a '' and ':)' to indicate I
> was joking
> Would ';)' have been a better emoticon?
I've
Robert Seeberger wrote:
> > > With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United
> > > States has now
> > > let the United Nations deliberate for nearly two months (and
> > > counting) on
> > > its dispute with Iraq?
> >
> >
> >
> > "..the US has *let* the UN deliberate..."?
> >
> > Intere
Dan Minette wrote:
> Why I can see being opposed to attacking Iraq, I'm rather
> surprised by your
> language.
Could you specify the exact portions please?
> 1) Do you think that Iraq is not in material breach of the
> provisions that
> ended the Gulf War? My understanding is that Iraq agree
- Original Message -
From: "Ritu Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:51 PM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
>
>
> John D. Giorgis wrote:
>
> > With that being said, has anybody noticed that the Unit
- Original Message -
From: "Ritu Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:51 PM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
>
>
> John D. Giorgis wrote:
>
> > With that being said, has anybody noticed that the Unit
John D. Giorgis wrote:
> With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United
> States has now
> let the United Nations deliberate for nearly two months (and
> counting) on
> its dispute with Iraq?
"..the US has *let* the UN deliberate..."?
Interesting terminology there, JDG. :)
John D. Giorgis wrote:
Does anyone know if the rest of the world is giving the US credit for
sticking with the multilateral approach, and engaging both its allies and
the UNSC members in very long and difficult negotiations, and working
towards an ultimate resolution in the United Nations that wi
47 matches
Mail list logo
