Re: List administrators: list broken!

Bruce Bostwick said the following on 8/22/2009 1:37 AM: > On Aug 21, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Lance A. Brown wrote: > >> Heh. I thought the list had just taken a deep breath. Instead it >> appears something has gone awry. I, too, am not receiving everything >> that is listed in the archive. >> >> -

Re: List administrators: list broken!

On Aug 21, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Lance A. Brown wrote: Heh. I thought the list had just taken a deep breath. Instead it appears something has gone awry. I, too, am not receiving everything that is listed in the archive. --[Lance] .. there's an archive? :\ The whole aim of practical politics

Re: List administrators: list broken!

John Williams wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:43 PM, David Hobby wrote: John Williams wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Hobby wrote: (I'm not sure passive/aggressive is the right word, but seriously, give it a rest...) One of us apparently has no sense of humor. Because of cour

Re: List administrators: list broken!

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:43 PM, David Hobby wrote: > John Williams wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Hobby wrote: >> >>> (I'm not sure passive/aggressive is the right word, >>> but seriously, give it a rest...) >> >> One of us apparently has no sense of humor. > > Because of cour

Re: List administrators: list broken!

John Williams wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Hobby wrote: (I'm not sure passive/aggressive is the right word, but seriously, give it a rest...) One of us apparently has no sense of humor. Because of course, it couldn't just have not been funny. : )

Re: List administrators: list broken!

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Hobby wrote: > (I'm not sure passive/aggressive is the right word, > but seriously, give it a rest...) One of us apparently has no sense of humor. ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: List administrators: list broken!

John Williams wrote: ... I wonder if the list administrators are reading this thread... Where are the "we" ? Right here, as always. But "we" don't own the list. (I'm not sure passive/aggressive is the right word, but seriously, give it a rest...) ---David ___

Re: List administrators: list broken!

And I am breaking the general rule about replying to yourself to note that the following message apparently went through and came back quickly with no problems . . . At 05:44 PM Friday 8/21/2009, you wrote: At 04:30 PM Friday 8/21/2009, Nick Arnett wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, John

Re: List administrators: list broken!

At 04:30 PM Friday 8/21/2009, Nick Arnett wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, John Williams wrote: I wonder if the list administrators are reading this thread... I am reading... and I'm not sure what's going on.  The list lives at Bluehost these days, which ha

Re: List administrators: list broken!

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, John Williams wrote: > > I wonder if the list administrators are reading this thread... I am reading... and I'm not sure what's going on. The list lives at Bluehost these days, which has the virtue of being inexpensive, but frustrating to deal with. I'll see if

Re: List administrators: list broken!

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote: > I take it you saw both copies of those?  I haven't seen either copy of any > of them. I only saw the second copy on the archive: http://mccmedia.com/pipermail/brin-l_mccmedia.com/Week-of-Mon-20090817/date.html But I did receive your em

Re: List administrators: list broken!

At 11:48 AM Friday 8/21/2009, John Williams wrote: List administrators: It seems that many list emails are not being sent out to list members. They are showing up on the archive, but there are many that are not being emailed to me. I think Ronn may also be in a similar situation (judging from hi

Re: List administrators: list broken!

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Lance A. Brown wrote: > Heh.  I thought the list had just taken a deep breath.  Instead it > appears something has gone awry.  I, too, am not receiving everything > that is listed in the archive. Maybe it is fixed now, at least for new posts? I received Chris's ava

Re: List administrators: list broken!

Heh. I thought the list had just taken a deep breath. Instead it appears something has gone awry. I, too, am not receiving everything that is listed in the archive. --[Lance] -- GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9 CACert.org Assurer _