Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 05:54 PM 12/22/03, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 10:54 AM 12/22/03, Julia Thompson wrote:
Sonja van Baardwijk wrote:
Personally I have noticed that my sensitivity to smoke has been heavily
increased the less I'm exposed to
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
At 04:43 AM 12/20/03, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 10:54 AM 12/22/03, Julia Thompson wrote:
Sonja van Baardwijk wrote:
Personally I have noticed that my sensitivity to smoke has been heavily
increased the less I'm exposed to it. Nothing psychosomatic about it.
There was one year that I managed to increase
At 05:54 PM 12/22/03, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 10:54 AM 12/22/03, Julia Thompson wrote:
Sonja van Baardwijk wrote:
Personally I have noticed that my sensitivity to smoke has been heavily
increased the less I'm exposed to it. Nothing psychosomatic about it.
At 02:37 AM 12/20/03, Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped most
Regarding DDT: Banning DDT was not a mistake, as a
matter of fact, Mr.
Crichton's** insistance that it was a mistake, and
that DDT is safe, are mistakes on his part...
...so an internet
At 03:52 AM 12/21/2003, you wrote:
At 02:37 AM 12/20/03, Deborah Harrell wrote:
snip
Yes, it would indeed be nice if someone could find an alternative which
was nearly (90%+?) as effective as DDT at killing the insects which spread
disease to humans while being much safer (10% as toxic?) as DDT,
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
At 04:43 AM 12/20/03, Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- Doug Pensinger [EMAIL
At 11:28 AM 12/21/03, Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
At 04:43 AM 12/20/03,
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
At 04:43 AM 12/20/03, Deborah Harrell
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
At 11:28 AM 12/21/03, Robert Seeberger wrote:
*Note: Not a defense
At 12:12 PM 12/21/03, Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
At 11:28 AM 12/21/03, Robert
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
At 12:12 PM 12/21/03, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I used to suffer
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
And FWIW, like Julia, different types of smoke do cause different levels of
reaction. Like her, pipe smoke doesn't bother me as much as cigarette
smoke. And I suppose it is indeed possible that different brands of
cigarettes do cause different levels of irritation:
At 12:28 PM 12/21/2003, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Environmentalism is Evil and Must Be Destroyed
It takes a lot less time than that for
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe second-hand smoke isn't as dangerous as
professed, but I am sure as
hell happy I don't have to breathe it anymore.
Anecdotaly, I got bronchitis *every time* I was
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:12 PM 12/21/03, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I used to suffer seasonally from hay fever so bad that my face would
swell
and I had terrible headaches.
The funny thing is, when I started smoking that all ceased. I
allergies started to clear up, and then they were almost
entirely gone for
the rest of the week. It was like the massive allergen
exposure forced my
body to quit complaining and just get over it.
I probably read this suggestion on this list, but somewhere I read that
if you get
Gary Nunn wrote:
allergies started to clear up, and then they were almost
entirely gone for
the rest of the week. It was like the massive allergen
exposure forced my
body to quit complaining and just get over it.
I probably read this suggestion on this list, but somewhere I read
--- Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped most
Regarding DDT: Banning DDT was not a mistake, as a
matter of fact, Mr.
Crichton's** insistance that it was a mistake, and
that DDT is safe, are mistakes on his part...
...so an internet search of articles with many
sources cited
--- Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippage throughout
I'm not sure that even a majority of
environmentalists believe in the idea
of a noble savage or that we need to save the planet
(as if we could kill it).
Ah, but that weakens his argument of Environmentalism
as Religion.
Doug Pensinger wrote:
In any case I consider my self an environmentalist, but I don't think
we're going to get much accomplished if the fringe groups are able to
make it look like the whole movement is driven by pseudo-science.
This is the crux of the matter, and the sad fact is that even the
At 09:54 PM 12/16/03, Michael Harney wrote:
P.P.S. Never insult me or what I believe unless you are ready to face a
challenge.
It was not meant as an insult to you or what you believe. I feel rather
strongly about this subject, too, but I don't want to unnecessarily upset
anyone or risk
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:54 PM 12/16/03, Michael Harney wrote:
P.P.S. Never insult me or what I believe unless you are ready to face a
challenge.
It was not meant as an insult to you or what you believe. I feel rather
strongly about this subject, too, but I
Michael wrote:
No worries, you didn't write it, you just posted it. Nor did you say
where you stand on the topic. It was the people on-list agreeing with
it that
irked me more than the post itself.
Since I'm the only one that said he agreed with anything Crichton wrote,
let me modify my
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:21:33 -0600, Ronn!Blankenship
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remarks to the Commonwealth Club
by Michael Crichton
San Francisco
September 15, 2003
snip
I agree with a lot of what Crichton has to say, but have a few
observations.
Even if all the non-religious (in the
Large tirade against environmentalism by Michael Crichton snipped. (snipped
to save bandwidth and keep post length down, besides not much of it was
particularly quote-worthy).
Regarding environmentalists being faith-based beliefs: Not here, most of
the environmental beliefs I have is based on
Makes more sense than the last few novels of his that I've read.
(Insert rimshot here)
Vilyehm Teighlore
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
27 matches
Mail list logo
