Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-22 Thread William T Goodall
On 22 Feb 2004, at 2:17 am, Gautam Mukunda wrote: --- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard Baker wrote: And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, *SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't write this! ...or did he? Too easy. Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-22 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 10:21 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote: "Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > At 10:04 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote: > >Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > > > > Someone called for an electrician? > > > > > > xponent > > > House Calls Maru > > > rob > > > >Yeah, you know anything about installing a heat l

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-21 Thread Julia Thompson
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > At 10:04 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote: > >Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > > > > Someone called for an electrician? > > > > > > xponent > > > House Calls Maru > > > rob > > > >Yeah, you know anything about installing a heat light in a bathroom? > > Yes. *Don't* put

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-21 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 10:04 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote: Robert Seeberger wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:07 PM > Subject: Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L -

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-21 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard > Baker wrote: > > > And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, > *SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't > > write this! ...or did he? > > Too easy. > > Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ My theory has alwa

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-21 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard Baker wrote: > And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, *SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't > write this! ...or did he? Too easy. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailm

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-21 Thread Richard Baker
The Fool said: >> And I must say that I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, I tell you, to find none > of >> Brin-L's reisdent left-wingers criticzing this absurdity, and in >> fact, several of them praising it. > > And I must say that I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, I tell you, to find none > of Brin-L's reisdent r

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-21 Thread The Fool
> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > At 02:34 PM 2/20/2004 -0800 Dave Land wrote: > >John, > > > >>>I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San > >>>Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while watching > >>>the local newscast. :-D >

Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Hate_Amendment)

2004-02-20 Thread The Fool
> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 01:57 PM 2/18/2004 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote: > >I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San > >Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while watching > >the local newscast. :-D > > I presume by th