Re: What some women have always known . . .

David Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Deborah Harrell wrote: David Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or, put briefly, Not tonight, honey. I have a PhD. scratching head - I mean *forehead* - in puzzlement I must be rather thick today...care to elucidate further? Are you trying to say

Re: What some women have always known . . .

Or, put briefly, Not tonight, honey. I have a PhD. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: What some women have always known . . .

David Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or, put briefly, Not tonight, honey. I have a PhD. scratching head - I mean *forehead* - in puzzlement I must be rather thick today...care to elucidate further? Debbi Forever In Bluejeans ;) __ Do You

Re: What some women have always known . . .

Deborah Harrell wrote: David Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or, put briefly, Not tonight, honey. I have a PhD. scratching head - I mean *forehead* - in puzzlement I must be rather thick today...care to elucidate further? Are you trying to say that you're promiscuous?

RE: What some women have always known . . .

Julia Thompson Subject: Re: What some women have always known . . . Deborah Harrell wrote: Wasn't an article posted some time back about human females selecting for humor in their mates, as a possible driving force for larger brain capacity? Or was that in one of Himself's

Re: What some women have always known . . .

Andrew Paul wrote: Julia Thompson Subject: Re: What some women have always known . . . Deborah Harrell wrote: Wasn't an article posted some time back about human females selecting for humor in their mates, as a possible driving force for larger brain capacity? Or was that in one

RE: What some women have always known . . .

Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: Deborah Harrell wrote: Wasn't an article posted some time back about human females selecting for humor in their mates, as a possible driving force for larger brain capacity? Or was that in one of Himself's writings?

What some women have always known . . .

SYRACUSE, N.Y. -- For some male bats, sexual prowess comes with a price -- smaller brains. A research team led by Syracuse University biologist Scott Pitnick found that in bat species where the females are promiscuous, the males boasting the largest testicles also had the smallest brains.

Re: What some women have always known . . .

Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip It turns out size does matter, said Pitnick, whose findings were published in December in Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Science, an online journal. The study offers evidence that males -- at least in some species -- make an

Re: What some women have always known . . .

Deborah Harrell wrote: Wasn't an article posted some time back about human females selecting for humor in their mates, as a possible driving force for larger brain capacity? Or was that in one of Himself's writings? Selection for humor seems overrated when one is sleep-deprived. :)