On Jul 6, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
I was talking with another nerd recently about some kind of *ultra*
secure Linux that wouldn't even give you root on installation. So much
for getting 0wned. It's really more of a joke I think, but could be
useful, I guess, for net appliances a
On Jul 6, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Horn, John wrote:
Behalf Of Warren Ockrassa
I was talking with another nerd recently about some kind of
*ultra*
secure Linux that wouldn't even give you root on
installation. So much
for getting 0wned. It's really more of a joke I think, but could
be
useful, I g
> Behalf Of Warren Ockrassa
>
> I was talking with another nerd recently about some kind of
*ultra*
> secure Linux that wouldn't even give you root on
> installation. So much
> for getting 0wned. It's really more of a joke I think, but could
be
> useful, I guess, for net appliances and other t
On Jul 5, 2005, at 3:32 PM, Russell Chapman wrote:
The significant point here is that unless you have access to a second
machine with a burner and a reasonable amount of tech-savvy, it takes
(a lot) longer than 12 minutes to secure a Windows PC.
That assumes one plugs the machine into a net c
William T Goodall wrote:
It now takes just twelve minutes for an improperly protected[1]
Windows PC connected to the internet to become infected.
[1] Most of them in other words.
The significant point here is that unless you have access to a second
machine with a burner and a reasonable am
It now takes just twelve minutes for an improperly protected[1]
Windows PC connected to the internet to become infected.
http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/1511
[1] Most of them in other words.
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio
