Re: Testing...

Charlie wrote: > Living In A Land Down Under You better run, you better take cover. Doug Californication ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

RE: Testing...

Let me join in the test. http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/ > Subject: Testing... > From: char...@culturelist.org > Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:04:27 +1000 > To: brin-l@mccmedia.com > > Testing… > > 1… 1… > > Charlie > __

Re: Testing...

On 19/09/2011, at 6:04 PM, Charlie Bell wrote: > Testing… Woohoo. It's alive. ALIIIVV!!! *cackle* Hi folks, Yes, I'm still about. Charlie Living In A Land Down Under ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Testing...

Testing… 1… 1… Charlie ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: Testing for DB

On 20/02/2009, at 4:37 AM, Nick Arnett wrote: This message should not reach (i.e., bother) David Brin. It bothered me. ;-) Charlie. ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: Testing for DB

>>This message should not reach (i.e., bother) David Brin. Nick Alas, This one did... as well as the other one. So it isn't working. Bear with us, folks! db___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Testing for DB

This message should not reach (i.e., bother) David Brin. ;-) Nick ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Testing?

If you are, today's Giveaway of the Day may be useful: "Adit Testdesk is an ad hoc suite of tools that enables you to build tests, run them and analyze test results. Using its robust library with over 10 question types, you can create a test of a

Fw: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:13 PM Subject: Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities > > On 8/25/2007 12:55:45 PM, Martin Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Dave Land wrote: > On Aug 27, 2007, at 6:49 AM, Martin Lewis wrote: > >>> I think also this could impinge upon 5th amendment debates. >> >> Which one is that? > > It must suck not to have the Internet :-). > > As for the 5th amendment, it has to do with due process of law.

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On Aug 27, 2007, at 6:49 AM, Martin Lewis wrote: >> I think also this could impinge upon 5th amendment debates. > > Which one is that? It must suck not to have the Internet :-). As for the 5th amendment, it has to do with due process of law. In short, don't expect any arrests of the population

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On 8/25/07, Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I see the similarity in method. The only difference I see is that > the Oregon study looked at several drug traces and the UN report looks > only at cocaine. Yeah, I just knew I'd seen the method used elsewhere. Strange the Oregon st

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On 8/25/2007 10:09:47 AM, Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Aug 25, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Nick Arnett wrote: > > > On 8/25/07, Martin Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Check Section 4: Methodology. They have a graph of estimated > >> cocaine > >> use based on waste water analysis on

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On Aug 25, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Nick Arnett wrote: > On 8/25/07, Martin Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Check Section 4: Methodology. They have a graph of estimated cocaine >> use based on waste water analysis on page 272. New York City is >> number >> one by some margin. > > Are they, like

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

ome magazine lists the 10 fattest cities or the 10 most polluted cities...) > > > I think also this could impinge upon 5th amendment debates. > Part of the 5th amendment protects one against being forced to testify against ones self. (some would say against self-incriminatio

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On 8/25/07, Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I see the similarity in method. The only difference I see is that > the Oregon study looked at several drug traces and the UN report looks > only at cocaine. Yeah, I just knew I'd seen the method used elsewhere. Strange the Oregon st

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

gt; > worldwide? > > > > > > http://www.unodc.org/unodc/world_drug_report.html > > > > Not that I can tell. I looked through the prefaces and the > > methodology > > and couldn't > find a mention of wastewater testing. > > Can you point

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On 8/25/07, Martin Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Check Section 4: Methodology. They have a graph of estimated cocaine > use based on waste water analysis on page 272. New York City is number > one by some margin. Are they, like, totally wasted? Nick -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

at they could get a good > > > snapshot of > > > what people are taking. > > > > Isn't this just what the UN do but they name the cities and it is > > worldwide? > > > > http://www.unodc.org/unodc/world_drug_report.html > > Not that I can tell.

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

t this just what the UN but theyname the cities and it is > worldwide? > > http://www.unodc.org/unodc/world_drug_report.html > Not that I can tell. I looked through the prefaces and the methodology and couldn't find a mention of wastewater testing. Can you point to the relevant mentions?

Re: Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

On 8/25/07, Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://www.click2houston.com/health/13948804/detail.html?treets=hou&tml=hou_8pm&ts=T&tmi=hou_8pm_1_08000508242007 > Oregon State University scientists tested 10 unnamed American cities > for remnants of drugs, both legal and illegal, from wa

Water Allows Drug Testing Of Whole Cities

State team. The scientists presented their results Tuesday at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston. Two federal agencies have taken samples from U.S. waterways to see if drug testing a whole city is doable, but they haven't gotten as far as the Oregon researchers. One of

Re: Working (was: ADMIN: Testing)

> Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >The list should be working... but is it? > > Does self employed count? > It had better; ponies need new shoes, kitties need > kibble, and the car needs a visit to the mechanic > (

Working (was: ADMIN: Testing)

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >The list should be working... but is it? > Does self employed count? It had better; ponies need new shoes, kitties need kibble, and the car needs a visit to the mechanic (front door won't open from the outside, but will from inside..

Re: ADMIN: Testing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 12/5/2006 10:15:52 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The list should be working... but is it? Does self employed count? Vilyehm If it's keeping you off the street and feeding you, then yes. Julia ___

Re: ADMIN: Testing

In a message dated 12/5/2006 10:15:52 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The list should be working... but is it? Does self employed count? Vilyehm ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: ADMIN: Testing

Charlie Bell wrote: On 06/12/2006, at 4:15 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: The list should be working... but is it? It's Schrodinger's List. Charlie. Testing Testing Maru http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/ladies/6f59/ (Wore it yesterday.)

Re: ADMIN: Testing

On 06/12/2006, at 4:21 PM, Charlie Bell wrote: On 06/12/2006, at 4:15 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: The list should be working... but is it? It's Schrodinger's List. Charlie. Testing Testing Maru Reply - response in about 20 seconds. That'll do. Charlie Satisfie

Re: ADMIN: Testing

On 06/12/2006, at 4:15 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: The list should be working... but is it? It's Schrodinger's List. Charlie. Testing Testing Maru ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: ADMIN: Testing

Finally!!! We have had a weird, wierd network problem here. On 12/5/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nick Arnett wrote: > The list should be working... but is it? Well, I'll respond to your message and see if it comes back to me in a reasonable amount of time Julia

Re: ADMIN: Testing

Julia Thompson wrote: Nick Arnett wrote: The list should be working... but is it? Well, I'll respond to your message and see if it comes back to me in a reasonable amount of time Julia too beat to do much else here right now Well, that was quick! Need to head to bed. Long day.

Re: ADMIN: Testing

Nick Arnett wrote: The list should be working... but is it? Well, I'll respond to your message and see if it comes back to me in a reasonable amount of time Julia too beat to do much else here right now ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/ma

ADMIN: Testing

The list should be working... but is it? -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages: 408-904-7198 ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Hello, Testing, 1 2 3 Testing

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My digest-subscribed address has not received anything since July 29, if > that data point helps anyone For those interested in the digest, I've been reading the List via the Yahoo! Groups digest for some time now. JD

Re: Hello, Testing, 1 2 3 Testing

On 10/16/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My digest-subscribed address has not received anything since July 29, if that data point helps anyone You, too?! Something odd is going on... I'll work on it as I have time, but that's always an issue. Nick -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL P

Re: Hello, Testing, 1 2 3 Testing

Jo Anne wrote: Hello Group -- Supposedly I'm subscribed, but I'm not getting any mail. Nick suggested I try posting to the list to see if I show up that way. Am I being heard??? Amities, all. I've missed you. Jo Anne [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're getting through to the list. My digest-subscri

RE: Hello, Testing, 1 2 3 Testing

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jo Anne > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:06 PM > To: brin-l@mccmedia.com > Subject: Hello, Testing, 1 2 3 Testing > > Hello Group -- > > Supposedly I'm subsc

Hello, Testing, 1 2 3 Testing

Hello Group -- Supposedly I'm subscribed, but I'm not getting any mail. Nick suggested I try posting to the list to see if I show up that way. Am I being heard??? Amities, all. I've missed you. Jo Anne [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://www.mccmedia.com

Re: Testing...

I'm not home... - Original Message From: Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 9:38:50 AM Subject: Re: Testing... On 22/07/2006, at 2:19 AM, Nick Arnett wrote: > Hello, hello? Can anybody hear this? Just nod if you can

Re: Testing...

On 22/07/2006, at 2:19 AM, Nick Arnett wrote: Hello, hello? Can anybody hear this? Just nod if you can hear me is there anyone at home? Charlie ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Testing...

Hello, hello? Can anybody hear this? Nick On 7/20/06, Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1,2,3 -- Doug ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages: 408-904-7198 _

Testing...

1,2,3 -- Doug ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Testing brin-l

"If Americans think you want to protect and enhance their retirement security, they'll back you," [Frank Luntz] wrote. "If they think you want to reduce their benefits, for ANY reason, they'll oppose you." Now in a sane world the fact that Republicans DO want to reduce benefits would be enough to d

Re: TESTING: Brin test

Nick, don't panic. All's well if there are lingering messages. I ain't mad. Don't sweat it. Just thrive. --- Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a test to see if we can, indeed, moderate > all messages with > "Brin:" in the subject, so that we can easily shut > off the message

TESTING: Brin: test

This is a test to see if we can, indeed, moderate all messages with "Brin:" in the subject, so that we can easily shut off the message flow to David. If it works, nobody will see this message. If it doesn't... sorry. Nick ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/ma

Re: Testing . . . testing . . .

On 13 Sep 2004, at 3:06 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: My Internet connection went down three weeks ago tomorrow. It looks like it's back this morning. Let's see if this goes through . . . There's service for you! -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blo

Testing . . . testing . . .

My Internet connection went down three weeks ago tomorrow. It looks like it's back this morning. Let's see if this goes through . . . -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

USDA Blocks Companies From Testing ~All~ Their Cattle For Mad-Cow

h can cause a fatal brain disease in humans who eat infected meat. The way Creekstone Farms sees it, 100% testing would reassure U.S customers. The company also says it is talking with Japan about restarting exports there, where total testing is required. But the firm has run into surprising obst

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

hen I received his "Testing" message. > > > > -- Ronn! :) > I knew something was wrong when I didn't see the Return of the King post come up Friday night. I think there was a spillover effect. Went to an estatle sale today that listed a "selection of boo

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

essages from the list since apparently some time on Friday. I was thinking about either sending a test message to the list or trying to reach Dan when I received his "Testing" message. -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

In a message dated 4/10/2004 4:19:41 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > It got through. I was beginning to wonder . . . > About one's server, or about one's serenity? Vilyehm ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

At 05:36 PM 4/10/04, Nick Arnett wrote: Between the server and our Internet connection, my serenity has been endangered for about 34 hours now... This is a test message. It got through. I was beginning to wonder . . . -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www

[ADMIN] Testing

Between the server and our Internet connection, my serenity has been endangered for about 34 hours now... This is a test message. -- Nick Arnett Director, Business Intelligence Services LiveWorld Inc. Phone/fax: (408) 551-0427 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ htt

ADMIN (was: Testing)

Doug Pensinger wrote: I'm seeing my messages an replys to them on mcmedia, but haven't recieved anything myself since 9:30 AM PST. Our Internet connection went down for a few hours today... don't know why. As long as I'm mentioning such things, I'll mention that I should have some news about my

Testing

I'm seeing my messages an replys to them on mcmedia, but haven't recieved anything myself since 9:30 AM PST. -- Doug ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Scouted: Fair testing?

>Wait, wait wait. How is a "student" in a "persistent vegetative state"? I >not joking about this. If there are more than one percent of students who >have zero improvement, then maybe the "students" need physical therapists, >not "teachers". > >Kevin T. - VRWC Students usually/always (?it has

Re: Scouted: Fair testing?

ed and often were assumed to lack intellectual ability since traditional test methods did not meet their needs (ie if someone had spastic hands and could not control a pencil they could not take conventional IQ tests and were labeled as severely retarded when in reality less "standardized&qu

Re: Scouted: Fair testing?

--- Kevin Tarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [I wrote]: > >This sounds like one of the stupidest things I've > ever > >heard, and one of my CO collegues with 20 years in > >speech therapy/special education commented (when I > >asked if this was true): "It is not only true, it is > >actually worse tha

Re: Scouted: Fair testing?

This sounds like one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, and one of my CO collegues with 20 years in speech therapy/special education commented (when I asked if this was true): "It is not only true, it is actually worse than this. Students who are in a persistant vegetative state have been r

Scouted: Fair testing?

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SPECIAL_ED_TESTING?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT >>"...When it comes time to take the standardized tests that the federal government uses to measure public schools, many of Harper's students at White Mountain Middle School merely pick answers at

Re: testing

At 09:09 PM 8/26/03 -0700, Doug Pensinger wrote: Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 10:09 PM 8/26/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote: At least I have made good use of the extra time available not reading listmail by reading more books. I made use of the downtime by (1) working on some still-unfinished graphics

Re: testing

Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 10:09 PM 8/26/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote: At least I have made good use of the extra time available not reading listmail by reading more books. I made use of the downtime by (1) working on some still-unfinished graphics which should have been finished already and (2

Re: testing

At 10:09 PM 8/26/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote: At least I have made good use of the extra time available not reading listmail by reading more books. I made use of the downtime by (1) working on some still-unfinished graphics which should have been finished already and (2) school started yesterday

Re: Testing...

At 08:21 PM 8/25/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote: I've sent email to the list on Sunday (about not getting any email) but haven't seen anything in my inbox from the list since Saturday. I can see that a few messages have been added to the archive since then, but I haven't seen any of them in

Re: ADMIN: More blasted testing

In a message dated 8/25/2003 9:38:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I've upgraded Mailman from 2.1 to 2.1.2 and hope that now > it'll behave. But > there's also a patch I think I need to apply... > > Let's just see if this message gets out. Got it > > -- > Nick

ADMIN: More blasted testing

I've upgraded Mailman from 2.1 to 2.1.2 and hope that now it'll behave. But there's also a patch I think I need to apply... Let's just see if this message gets out. -- Nick Arnett Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://www.mccmedia.co

testing

No e-mails since 22-Aug. :-( Ilana ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Testing...

I've sent email to the list on Sunday (about not getting any email) but haven't seen anything in my inbox from the list since Saturday. I can see that a few messages have been added to the archive since then, but I haven't seen any of them in email. In fact the last list mail I received was th

testing

William wrote: > I've sent email to the list on Sunday (about not getting any email) but > haven't seen anything in my inbox from the list since Saturday. I can > see that a few messages have been added to the archive since then, but > I haven't seen any of them in email. > > In fact the last li

Testing from Yahoo

Testing to the list from Yahoo... -- Nick Arnett Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Testing...

I'm sending another message just so that I can watch the mail log right afterwards... please ignore. -- Nick Arnett Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: Testing...

roblem or just a serious delay. Thanks! Nick -- Nick Arnett Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Nick Arnett > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:34 AM > To: Killer Bs Discussion

Testing

Still nothing... -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/ "Aerospace is plumbing with the volume turned up." - John Carmack ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/br

testing

testing ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l