> Sean may have a better approach, but FWIW my thought on testing would be to
> have a series of test programs, geared for the various cases (P/P, P/C, C/C,
> C/S, etc.) that can accept a 3dm file or a .g file defining test cases, and
> allow the specification of specific inputs for a given test
On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:00 PM, H.S.Rai wrote:
> Is it so? Don't 3D model made in AutoCAD stored in DWG?
That's like saying BRL-CAD supports 2D models, because we store them in our .g
file format. We do, but we don't do it very well or very often (certainly not
the default recommended practice)
Thanks for detailed reply.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 08:10 AM, "H.S.Rai" wrote:
>
> Is there any plan to have DWG (AutoCAD format) import / export? Rather
> is there any need / demand for this?
>
>
> Great question. Robust geometr
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
>
> There's another aspect to this intersection question that might be worth
> investigating - earlier versions of opennurbs contained a header
> opennurbs_x.h that defined a ON_X_EVENT class to be used to report C/C and
> C/S intersections.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:41 PM, phoenix <284281...@qq.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will still take some time to think further about this, and update my
> proposal (maybe a lot) in a few days.
>
> I have updated my proposal at:
> http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Phoenix/GSoc2013/Proposal
>
> In my new propo
Hi,
I will still take some time to think further about this, and update my proposal
(maybe a lot) in a few days.
I have updated my proposal at:
http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Phoenix/GSoc2013/Proposal
In my new proposal, I emphasis more about tests and verification, and the goal
is to make the
