> Won't we know that already?
Even though we don't know that already, it's quite easy to acquire that
information. It's not a significant question.
> Maybe I'm not following properly, but will there be a situation involving
> Bezier patches where knowing which are the "red", "gray" and "bl
> As I understand it, the plan is not to explicitly convert to Bezier patches -
> the idea is that if we use the isocurves defined by the knots we'll have a
> grid in UV space, and the "patches" within the knots should have Bezier-like
> behavior - the intersection test then reduces to isocurves
Hi Everyone,
I will like all developers and GSoC participants for BRL-CAD to join me in
celebrating my birthday tomorrow.
which I will be taking the day off to celebrate at home with friends and
family.
Cheers!
Nyah
--
S
On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
> wrote:
>
> It's a shame we have to use Bezier patches at all. I wonder if sorting
> through the surface tree to find overlapping subregions would be faster
> (since it's work we
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
>
> > Excellent picture, that helps a lot - yes, I think we agree, as long as
> that other paper's assertion that once we're down to Bezier patches we
> won't have any "patch in
The GSoC midterm evaluations are less than two weeks away! Mentors, please
check in with your students if they've not reported their progress lately and
check on the status of their work. Students, this is your reminder to check
your timeline and see whether you're on-track. Make sure your d
Thanks Sean :)
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:02 PM, check.nyah wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I will like all developers and GSoC participants for BRL-CAD to join me
> in celebrating my birthday tomorrow.
> > which I will be taking
On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:02 PM, check.nyah wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I will like all developers and GSoC participants for BRL-CAD to join me in
> celebrating my birthday tomorrow.
> which I will be taking the day off to celebrate at home with friends and
> family.
Hope you have a fantastic birth
Izak funny ahh..
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Isaac Kamga wrote:
> Happy birthday Ch3ck.
> Say hi to your wife and the seven-year old kid.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, <
> brlcad-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> Send brlcad-devel mailing list submissions to
>>
Happy birthday Ch3ck.
Say hi to your wife and the seven-year old kid.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, wrote:
> Send brlcad-devel mailing list submissions to
> brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.source
On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> Excellent picture, that helps a lot - yes, I think we agree, as long as that
> other paper's assertion that once we're down to Bezier patches we won't have
> any "patch internal" shared sub-surface intersection activity without
> involving th
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:47 PM, phoenix <284281...@qq.com> wrote:
> As currently we can get the boundary curve segments of the overlap regions
> (with "noisy" segments), the next we should do may be to construct the
> overlap regions with the boundary information. See the figure attached. In
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
