Re: [brlcad-devel] DocBook Changes NeededL Cliff!

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Tom Browder wrote: > I had that working for my limited use (book and chunk html only) with a > not-very-clean Perl system. With CMake I think we need maybe a separate xsl > file for: > > man/html > man/pdf (fo) > book/html > book/pdf (fo) > article/html

[brlcad-devel] documentation authorship

On a related note, the authorship on many of these "new" old documentation files is highly inaccurate per our current standards of tracking contributions. There are very few documents where individuals listed are actually the only people that were involved in their creation. This holds particu

Re: [brlcad-devel] DocBook Changes NeededL Cliff!

Actually, I'm not going to do anything until we can discuss the issue. Basically the problem is that only ONE xsl stylesheet can be called by xsltproc and that file must include all the required customizations (or include other files). I had that working for my limited use (book and chunk html on

[brlcad-devel] DocBook Changes NeededL Cliff!

I need to customize DB products more by type (man, article, book, etc.) and am creating an article customization xsl file. Keep an eye out to make sure I haven't hosed CMake! -Tom -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012,

Re: [brlcad-devel] Documentation From Recent Sources

On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Mandeep Simak wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison > wrote: >> You could certainly patch our actual Doxyfiles in misc/ or provide entirely >> new ones. > > I checked Doxyfile in misc/ folder. Only few folders from src/ are > included

Re: [brlcad-devel] documentation authorship

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote: > My suggestion would be (in cases like this were current documents are > based off of older ones) that the current version of the document note > that it is based off of the original document (by > Note my handling of authorship at rev 57345

Re: [brlcad-devel] documentation authorship

My suggestion would be (in cases like this were current documents are based off of older ones) that the current version of the document note that it is based off of the original document (by title/number/whatever) without itemizing the old authors. If anyone wants to know, they can research the ba

Re: [brlcad-devel] documentation authorship

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > On a related note, the authorship on many of these "new" old documentation > files is ... > Any thoughts on tracking authorship or doing like is done with sources and > removing all personal authorship or just trying harder to e

Re: [brlcad-devel] Documentation From Recent Sources

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > You could certainly patch our actual Doxyfiles in misc/ or provide entirely > new ones. I checked Doxyfile in misc/ folder. Only few folders from src/ are included as INPUT and doxygen_structure file which is used to organize mo

Re: [brlcad-devel] [brlcad-commits] SF.net SVN: brlcad:[57320] brlcad/trunk/doc/docbook/presentations/en

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > I may be scarred by a decade of using CVS, but this really does a number > on the backend repository. SVN is a lot better about compressing the space > on the fly, Okay, sorry, I won't do it again (and there are ways to remove

Re: [brlcad-devel] documentation authorship

On Aug 30, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Tom Browder wrote:On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: On a related note, the authorship on many of these "new" old documentation files is ... Any thoughts on tracking authorship or doing like is done with sources and r

Re: [brlcad-devel] [brlcad-commits] SF.net SVN: brlcad:[57320] brlcad/trunk/doc/docbook/presentations/en

On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison > wrote: > I may be scarred by a decade of using CVS, but this really does a number on > the backend repository. SVN is a lot better about compressing the space on > the fly, > > Ok

Re: [brlcad-devel] Application Development with BRL-CAD [presentation]

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Tom Browder wrote: > > Does anyone have a copy of the original (or updated) PowerPoint or, even > better, text version? It would make a good start for an updated reference > in DocBook format. > > Not

Re: [brlcad-devel] [brlcad-commits] SF.net SVN: brlcad:[57320] brlcad/trunk/doc/docbook/presentations/en

I may be scarred by a decade of using CVS, but this really does a number on the backend repository. SVN is a lot better about compressing the space on the fly, but adding relatively large binary files like this inherently bloats the repo even to just checkpoint and remove it as a reference file