On Sep 22, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> We find that the hypot function is a C99 function (see man hypot).
>
> So what is the approved solution for that? Macro guards?
If we test for the function in CMakeLists.txt, it will almost certainly pass a
function test but will fail a header
On Sep 22, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> Okay, I added this to misc/CMake/CompilerFlags.cmake:
>
> BRLCAD_CHECK_C_FLAG("std=c89" BUILD_TYPES Debug)
> BRLCAD_CHECK_C_FLAG("pedantic" BUILD_TYPES Debug)
>
> Should that do the trick with a Debug build?
The conformance flags should be bu
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison>
> wrote:
>> Still, the measure for migrating to C99 has been demonstrating
>> (and making the accommodations for) a strict C89 posix compilation baseline.
> Okay, I added this to mi
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
> Still, the measure for migrating to C99 has been demonstrating
> (and making the accommodations for) a strict C89 posix compilation baseline.
> Basically, it's a matter of setting the compilation flags to strict C89 mode
> and fi
Hi,
As a conclusion to your GSoC project you should write down what was
> achieved and what's still open ("not implemented" functions, frame
> buffer, ...)
>
> I have made a summary wiki page of my project that can be found here:
http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Vladbogolin/GSoC2013/qt-display-manager
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> ..
> However, maybe a macro can hide the arg type flag from the user on the
> C side. Something like:
...
Okay, I think I have a
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
..
> Ref different structs for different arg types: The arg type flag
> would still be required AFAIK unless we can use some C++ magic (will
> RTTI work?) on that side to disambiguate the
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> One problem with static initialization that's been bothering me is how
> to get info back from the C++ side without a pointer.
>
> Couldn't we use a pipe or read/write data to a tmp file? (Or shared memory?)
I just committed a new static API
Hi all,
This is the first year in which I was eligible for GSoC program and was
selected by the highly esteemed open source community BRL-CAD. Before
joining the project, I had just the glimpse of how large code bases are
maintained, but had never got hands on experience with them. I used git
vers
