On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
> We have a GCI patch that breaks nmg back out into a separate library. Anyone
> care
> to view/apply it, make sure the build isn't busted, make sure NMG references
> throughout the code/docs are correct, etc?
Working on the ini
2013/10/24 Christopher Sean Morrison :
>
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote:
>
>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Daniel Roßberg wrote:
>>
>>> exp2cxx crashes repeatedly during the BRL-CAD build with MSVC. The
>>> cause seems to be a mixing of malloc() and free() between
> Is there any hint in your CMakeCache.txt? I've scanned the entire hierarchy
> and find no manipulation of MD or MT manipulation, so it "should" be CMake's
> default (i.e., /MD).
This is what I did too (scanning the source directory hierarchy with
grep). And, if I remember right, I cleaned th
On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Daniel Roßberg wrote:
>
>> exp2cxx crashes repeatedly during the BRL-CAD build with MSVC. The
>> cause seems to be a mixing of malloc() and free() between the
>> different C-runtimes in the .exe and .d
On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Daniel Roßberg wrote:
> exp2cxx crashes repeatedly during the BRL-CAD build with MSVC. The
> cause seems to be a mixing of malloc() and free() between the
> different C-runtimes in the .exe and .dll files. For some reason STEP
> is compiled with the /MT flag (i.e.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:11 AM, wrote:
> Revision: 58283
> http://sourceforge.net/p/brlcad/code/58283
> Author: starseeker
> Date: 2013-10-24 15:11:20 + (Thu, 24 Oct 2013)
> Log Message:
> ---
> We don't have getppid on Windows - need to ask Tom what would work here
exp2cxx crashes repeatedly during the BRL-CAD build with MSVC. The
cause seems to be a mixing of malloc() and free() between the
different C-runtimes in the .exe and .dll files. For some reason STEP
is compiled with the /MT flag (i.e. static linked C-runtime). But it
should be compiled with the
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> I will do this one.
Well I replaced all the mentioned ** with the actual stats.
I had one confusion.
>From the article
"Google Code -In 2012 brought 69 budding new shoots and branches to
the mighty BRL-CAD tree"
Here I wrote 69, as the n
Ready for the new branch to load into the new VM.
-Tom
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and m
