On Nov 7, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison
> wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>>
>>> Is it fair to use any Boost code in BRL-CAD C++ code?
>>
>> We obviously use it now, but our main usage is now obsolete.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>
>> Is it fair to use any Boost code in BRL-CAD C++ code?
>
> We obviously use it now, but our main usage is now obsolete.
...
> Without Spirit, the cost-benefit is limited. I was ac
On Nov 7, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> Great, but I tried bcp on my file list and got 36 Mb instead of the
> 1.2 Mb that the trunk has at the moment--bummer!
That .. doesn't sound right. Or they seriously changed some things. Looking
at their Ohloh graph, it looks like they have gon
On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> Is it fair to use any Boost code in BRL-CAD C++ code?
We obviously use it now, but our main usage is now obsolete. Our LIBPC
(parametric constraint) library uses the Spirit parser in Boost, which is why
most of src/other/boost is there. That u
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>>> Is it fair to use any Boost code in BRL-CAD C++ code? If so, I think
...
> None at all, that's a good thing - just make libpc and
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Rob McDonald wrote:
> All,
>
> Thanks for your work on BRL-CAD and STEPcode. I've been studying some of
> BRL-CAD's step export capability to learn to use STEPcode to do the same.
Excellent!
> In that studying, I found a subtle bug that probably won't bite anybo
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> While packaging CMake 2.8.12 on FreeBSD, I noticed that BRL-CAD was
>> failing to build right at the configuration stage:
> ...
>
> Raphael, thanks for the rep
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> Is it fair to use any Boost code in BRL-CAD C++ code? If so, I think
> ...
>
> I take back my all my last statements as I realize the magnitude of
> the entire Boost library
Heh. I was a
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> Is it fair to use any Boost code in BRL-CAD C++ code? If so, I think
...
I take back my all my last statements as I realize the magnitude of
the entire Boost library (except it would be convenient to refer to
the BRL-CAD Boost include director
On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:35 AM, Daniel Roßberg wrote:
> There is a style guide mentioned. Is it the HACKING in a new format
> or a more detailed one?
During the writing of the book, several questions came up like whether to use a
serial comma, ray tracing vs raytracing, and other technical writing
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> While packaging CMake 2.8.12 on FreeBSD, I noticed that BRL-CAD was
> failing to build right at the configuration stage:
...
Raphael, thanks for the report. I'm sure our cmake expert will deal
with that problem soon,
Is it fair to use any Boost code in BRL-CAD C++ code? If so, I think
the cmake files need to reflect that (i.e., point to the entire
BRL-CAD Boost if not found on the local host). As it is now it seems
to be there for the convenience of a small set of files and much local
boost cmake testing.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
