Re: [brlcad-devel] New to BRLCAD

2014-02-12 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Feb 12, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Pulkit Agarwal wrote: > Hello, > I am new to the organization and would like to contribute. Please suggest me > how to start. That's fantastic. You can start with http://brlcad.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Checklist or ask questions. We've not finished updatin

[brlcad-devel] New to BRLCAD

2014-02-12 Thread Pulkit Agarwal
Hello, I am new to the organization and would like to contribute. Please suggest me how to start. Regards, Pulkit Agarwal -- Android apps run on BlackBerry 10 Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.

Re: [brlcad-devel] [brlcad-commits] SF.net SVN: brlcad:[59842] brlcad/trunk/src/libbu/tests

2014-02-12 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Feb 12, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Tom Browder wrote: >>> On a related note, I get a failure on test 66 even after the revert back to >>> %d, >>> so you seem to have exposed another consistency issue as well. Testing >>> printf directly, I get: >> >> Hm, I don't know why I didn't, but 'I'm checking

Re: [brlcad-devel] [brlcad-commits] SF.net SVN: brlcad:[59842] brlcad/trunk/src/libbu/tests

2014-02-12 Thread Tom Browder
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison > wrote: >> Tom, >> >> On a related note, I get a failure on test 66 even after the revert back to >> %d, >> so you seem to have exposed another consistency issue as well. Testing >

Re: [brlcad-devel] O'Reilly OSCON 2014, Speaker Application Due Tomorrow by COB

2014-02-12 Thread Tom Browder
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Tom Browder wrote: >> >> After looking at all again I'm revising the proposal to concentrate on >> our processes for mentoring during GSoC, GCI, etc. > > Attached is my revised proposal. [this never got sent,

Re: [brlcad-devel] [brlcad-commits] SF.net SVN: brlcad:[59842] brlcad/trunk/src/libbu/tests

2014-02-12 Thread Tom Browder
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > Tom, > > On a related note, I get a failure on test 66 even after the revert back to > %d, > so you seem to have exposed another consistency issue as well. Testing > printf directly, I get: Hm, I don't know why I didn't, but '