On May 31, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Ankesh Anand wrote:
> This may be what their intention is, but it is not what their license terms
> actually state. This is a common incorrect interpretation that open source
> use is not a commercial use. Especially under US law (and most jurisdictions
> that co
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 05:01:14PM +0530, Ankesh Anand wrote:
> I will look into the other libraries again and try to pick an alternative
> as soon as possible.
Last time I looked at web graphing libs, the two that really looked
impressive to me were D3 (which is a ten ton hammer) and flot. He
>
> This may be what their intention is, but it is not what their license
> terms actually state. This is a common incorrect interpretation that open
> source use is not a commercial use. Especially under US law (and most
> jurisdictions that come to mind), it very much is a commercial activity,
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
> There are many suitable charting and graphing options for web sites.
> I think we should use one that has terms that are unambiguously
> supportive of open source (by being licensed as open source
> themselves). What Piyush men
