Hey,
Try checking your spam folder for the OGV mail.
Thanks.
--
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pu
Now, I want to tell about my progress.
As I'm working on OGV back-end, so I'm trying to find bugs and modification
in the code.
I also submitted a bug. I'm following some blogs regarding meteor and
threejs to understand there working.
I have signed up but I'm not getting verification mail and also
Hi All,
Now that the submission deadline has pass, many of you can take a deep breath
and relax. However, instead of nervously waiting to see if you get selected,
please keep working as your interactions over the next two weeks can still
affect the desirability of your proposal submission.
Y
I recommend that you take a closer look at how IfcOpenShell actually works.
You may be able to re-use some of the concepts, and even some of the code
in your project.
Regarding the entities, the IFC and STEP schemas are available at
https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/tree/master/data, The sc
I have already submitted the proposal to GSoC site. I also created
this wiki page if my proposal needs any edits.
http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Gauravjeet/OGV_Proposal
Any reviews, feedbacks or suggestions are highly welcomed.
--
Fear is wisdom in the face of danger. It’s nothing to be ashamed o
Hey,
OGV is a listed project idea for GSoC this year. You can surely look around
the code at https://github.com/BRL-CAD/OGV-meteor
The todo list and other updates regarding OGV task list can be found here -
http://brlcad.org/wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO
> PS: Is it okay if the development of the f
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Charlie Stirk wrote:
> I made a comment on your proposal. In your diagram and description, you
> need to show how implicit geometry, in particular procedural things
> (extruded, revolved, swept), operate on explicit geometry (circle etc.).
I got your point about
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
> Those are not projects. Those are ideas that could turn into projects. You
> define the project.
>
> Of course, in order to create a successful project with reasonable
> objectives, you will need to study existing code, set up a
