On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
...
> We have acquired too many incomplete projects on trunk
> -- that's why most new efforts (e.g., OpenCL) are now being
> started on a branch where they arguably should
> have been in the first place.
Okay, I have committed a "
On May 13, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
>>> I'm leery of features getting implemented without a
>>> specific known use case (i.e., "if you build it, they will come"), but
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
>> I'm leery of features getting implemented without a
>> specific known use case (i.e., "if you build it, they will come"), but
The use case is a set of D bindings to add to the exi
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
> On May 13, 2014, at 10:08 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> What about starting with a defined D interface to the libraries? That
>> way D programmers would have access, and the stability of the public C
>> API should be conducive to ma
On May 13, 2014, at 10:08 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
> wrote:
>> That said, it can still be inspirational. If someone wants to work
>> on a branch or major new project using D or another language, that
>> would be a good way to demonstrat
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
...
>>> Crazy idea: C++ has been creeping into the source (good) but what
>>> about changing that creeping into the D language?
...
> I'm actually a big fan of some of the newer languages including D, Go, and
> Rust.
> Alas, conve
On May 13, 2014, at 6:59 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> Crazy idea: C++ has been creeping into the source (good) but what
>> about changing that creeping into the D language?
>
> With the implication of eventually converting ALL BRL-CAD compilat
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
>> El 13/05/14 12:59, Tom Browder ha escrit:
> ...
>>> With the implication of eventually converting ALL BRL-CAD compilation
>>> source into D, of course. (If Facebook can do it, why can't w
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> El 13/05/14 12:59, Tom Browder ha escrit:
...
>> With the implication of eventually converting ALL BRL-CAD compilation
>> source into D, of course. (If Facebook can do it, why can't we?)
...
> IMHO This is an excellent idea.
>
> Tcl/Tk has a b
El 13/05/14 12:59, Tom Browder ha escrit:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> Crazy idea: C++ has been creeping into the source (good) but what
>> about changing that creeping into the D language?
>
> With the implication of eventually converting ALL BRL-CAD compilation
> so
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> Crazy idea: C++ has been creeping into the source (good) but what
> about changing that creeping into the D language?
With the implication of eventually converting ALL BRL-CAD compilation
source into D, of course. (If Facebook can do it, why
Crazy idea: C++ has been creeping into the source (good) but what
about changing that creeping into the D language?
Cheers!
-Tom
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
