Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-31 Thread Harmanpreet Singh
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:41 PM, H.S.Rai wrote: > True. What I request you to elaborate a bit more (relating with para > above ended with [1] ). > >> Just because it lets you display and move a 3D model around does mean the >> interface is relevant or useful. Our domain is focused on engineeri

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-31 Thread H.S.Rai
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > Actually, I see LOTS of irrelevant features that add complexity but provide no > value for a CAD interface. True. > This is exactly why there is content creation modeling software like Maya and > 3D > Studio and solid modeli

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-28 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Jul 28, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Harmanpreet Singh wrote: > Since I already completed above two tasks so now I'm moving towards > implementing a web interface. Fortunately, I found one being already > in working state within the ThreeJS sources. Please check: > http://devplace.in/~harman/geometry_vie

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-28 Thread Harmanpreet Singh
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Harmanpreet Singh wrote: > >> But as now everything has been settled with the help of mentors, so >> before evaluations, I will visualize a standalone BRL-CAD model on >> browser and retrieve names o

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-26 Thread Vlad Bogolin
> Very nice work! Can we get a screenshot of Qt within a Tk window? > > Just posted some new screenshots on the wiki page: http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Vladbogolin/GSoC2013/Logs Cheers, Vlad -- See everything from the brow

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-26 Thread Clifford Yapp
> > One drawback for the approach we found is that Qt5.1 is necessary and that > the solution would not work on any previous Qt versions. > > > Meh. I don't consider that a drawback. Since this is brand new > foundation going forward, it's good to use/require the very latest possible > so that we

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-25 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Jul 25, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Vlad Bogolin wrote: > That's a shame that no help is to be had externally so far. Keep at it and > keep us informed what you find out. If it's a dead end, we can always push > towards a longer-term approach of decoupling Tk, but that will be more work. > > I have

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-25 Thread Vlad Bogolin
Hi, That's a shame that no help is to be had externally so far. Keep at it and > keep us informed what you find out. If it's a dead end, we can always push > towards a longer-term approach of decoupling Tk, but that will be more work. > I have managed to embed Qt in the Tk main window and commi

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Jul 23, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Vlad Bogolin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Vlad Bogolin wrote: > > C'mon now, Vlad, your project is also prime for showing a screenshot with > your window and lines being drawn! :) You do have a tricky problem there to > get your window to play wi

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Harmanpreet Singh wrote: > But as now everything has been settled with the help of mentors, so > before evaluations, I will visualize a standalone BRL-CAD model on > browser and retrieve names of objects from g file. Can't wait to see that! Implementing that and par

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Harmanpreet Singh
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > TODO: Over the next couple days, I'd like each of you post a quick > 1-paragraph summary of your progress. > > Try to answer these questions as briefly yet informatively as possible: What > CODE have you completed, why that co

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Vlad Bogolin
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Vlad Bogolin wrote: > > >> C'mon now, Vlad, your project is also prime for showing a screenshot with >> your window and lines being drawn! :) You do have a tricky problem there >> to get your window to play with Tk properly (or ignore it). Still no >> response

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread check.nyah
Hi, So far, I have *Implemented the pull_leaf() routine which builds a linked list from the CSG tree taking note of the matrix transformation at different nodes on the tree *Added orthogonal matrix support to the bn_mat_inverse() routine (mat.c) so as to increase speed i

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Mohit Daga
Hi! Here is a summary of my work. - I have modified the current code to accommodate the new icv struct. This included writing new functions to create, save, load images, writing pixels to images and modifying the existing usage of icv in src/rt src/remrt src/libged. Next, I have w

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Vlad Bogolin
> > C'mon now, Vlad, your project is also prime for showing a screenshot with > your window and lines being drawn! :) You do have a tricky problem there > to get your window to play with Tk properly (or ignore it). Still no > response to the questions you posted? > Still no answer just some vie

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
Thanks Kesha and Vlad, good summaries. On Jul 23, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Kesha Shah wrote: > • I have initially worked upon the code regarding the removal of > similar files from src like non-ors.cc, match-ors.cc, trynext.cc, > needFunc.h, needFunc.cc, collect.cc, entlist.cc, entnode.cc, multl

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Kesha Shah
Hello, > Try to answer these questions as briefly yet informatively as possible: > What CODE have you completed, why that code first, what are you working on > now, and what's immediately next? Try to keep it under five sentences but > don't be vague. Be detailed, specific. - I have initi

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-23 Thread Vlad Bogolin
Hi, Until now I have completed code for creating the main window, drawing 2d lines and drawing strings which is the basis of the Qt display manager. At the moment I am working at the 3d drawing functionality which should be done in the following days. The next thing is to solve the embedding probl

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-22 Thread phoenix
> By NURBS evaluations, I presume you mean Boolean evaluations? Yes, I mean Boolean evaluations. :) Cheers! Wu-- See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-22 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Jul 22, 2013, at 11:46 PM, phoenix wrote: > I have completed some code for independent NURBS intersections (P/P, P/C, > P/S, C/C, C/S and S/S) and the code for testing. This is the basis of NURBS > evaluation. What I'm doing now is modifying the surface-surface > intersections, cleaning up

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-22 Thread phoenix
> Try to answer these questions as briefly yet informatively as possible: What > CODE have you completed, why that code first, what are you working on now, > and what's immediately next? Try to keep it under five sentences but don't > be vague. Be detailed, specific. Pics, if applicable, is a

[brlcad-devel] GSoC Progress Update

2013-07-22 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
GSoC Participants, All around, most of you are doing a fantastic job as we are approaching the mid-point evaluations. Remember that you are expected to post details about your progress daily to your development logs. Several of you are doing great to take advantage of the mentors to help you