Re: [brlcad-devel] LGPL version 3 in BRL-CAD

2016-11-14 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
> @Sean, @Daniel I would be glad to make some progress with the X3D > converter. I just tried compiling the X3D code without libxml and I am > getting the following error Glad to hear it (that you’re interested in making progress, not the error)! :) > In file included from > brlcad/src/other/fr

Re: [brlcad-devel] LGPL version 3 in BRL-CAD

2016-11-14 Thread Clifford Yapp
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Konrad Djimeli wrote: > > It is not able to find the libxml within the BLR-CAD source. But when > I install libxml before compiling it, everything works fine. I would > try to look into it and see what is happening. Be aware that the libxml bundled with BRL-CAD is

Re: [brlcad-devel] LGPL version 3 in BRL-CAD

2016-11-14 Thread Konrad Djimeli
Hello, @Sean, @Daniel I would be glad to make some progress with the X3D converter. I just tried compiling the X3D code without libxml and I am getting the following error In file included from brlcad/src/other/freewrl/src/lib/x3d_parser/X3DParser.c:52:0: brlcad/misc/tools/xmltools/libxml/in

Re: [brlcad-devel] LGPL version 3 in BRL-CAD

2016-11-13 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
> On Nov 13, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Daniel Roßberg wrote: > > How do we handle LGPL version 2.1 incompatible licenses as the LGPL > version 3 used in FreeWRL? It should be possible to include it with > dynamical linkage, the usual way in BRL-CAD. Yeah, LGPL dependencies are generally suboptimal for

[brlcad-devel] LGPL version 3 in BRL-CAD

2016-11-13 Thread Daniel Roßberg
Hi, How do we handle LGPL version 2.1 incompatible licenses as the LGPL version 3 used in FreeWRL? It should be possible to include it with dynamical linkage, the usual way in BRL-CAD. I'm currently investigating patch 394 (https://sourceforge.net/p/brlcad/patches/394/) for obstacles to accept i