sist data. I know
> there are some very smart people here so I'm sure this is just a crazy
> concept but I had to throw it out there. Just a thought??
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> ____________________
> From: Daniel Roßberg
> To: BRL-CAD Developer Mailing List
smart
people here so I'm sure this is just a crazy concept but I had to throw it out
there. Just a thought??
Thanks,
David
From: Daniel Roßberg
To: BRL-CAD Developer Mailing List
Sent: Thu, March 31, 2011 3:09:18 PM
Subject: Re: [brlcad-dev
There was the question if using bu_external in the network
communication is a good idea or not. My answer was “yes and no”.
I think it's a bad idea if you want a well defined, easy to implement
(from scratch) and expandable (different versions can exchange data on
“common denominator” basis) data
On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Daniel Roßberg wrote:
> To be honest, I disapprove the latest changes on coreInterface. This
> library is intended to be an abstraction of BRL-CAD's core functions
> hiding the implementation details. Ideally it should be database
> version and implementation indepen
To be honest, I disapprove the latest changes on coreInterface. This
library is intended to be an abstraction of BRL-CAD's core functions
hiding the implementation details. Ideally it should be database
version and implementation independent. And least I want to see there
is a reference to a cor
