French contracted code (was Re: [BRLTTY] Unified french braille

2007-05-15 Thread Jason White
table) Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:37:10PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > A first version of the unified computer braille table was released, > here is a BRLTTY version. As a related question, is there an electronic version of the standard defining th

Re: French contracted code (was Re: [BRLTTY] Unified french braille

2007-05-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Jason White, le Tue 15 May 2007 20:30:50 +1000, a écrit : > I have an old version, How old is it? If it's 2001, then it looks like it is still at work, see http://www.avh.asso.fr/index.php?deficient=2&module=14&nameRub=nouveau_code&opt=2 and in particular the very end of http://www.avh.asso.

[BRLTTY] brl.cursor and electric fence error report

2007-05-15 Thread Jason White
The following occurred during normal operation of BRLTTY under electric fence as part of my testing process. Core was generated by `/bin/brltty'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00410ac6 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff9ccc9908) at ./main.c:2485 2485

Re: [BRLTTY] brl.cursor and electric fence error report

2007-05-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Jason White, le Wed 16 May 2007 10:08:56 +1000, a écrit : > The following occurred during normal operation of BRLTTY under electric fence > as part of my testing process. > > > Core was generated by `/bin/brltty'. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > #0 0x00410

Re: [BRLTTY] brl.cursor and electric fence error report

2007-05-15 Thread Jason White
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:16:25AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Do you have a way to reproduce it? I guess this was while using a > contraction table? I don't know how to reproduce it, and yes I probably was using a contraction table at the time. If there are any other variables you would lik

Re: [BRLTTY] brl.cursor and electric fence error report

2007-05-15 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Jason White on 2007/05/16 at 10:08 +1000] >Note also that brl.cursor = 40 and that the display has 40 cells. > >Does this look like a potential off-by-one bug? Absolutely. Please retest with the latest revision. I believe the condition was that you were on a line where the curso

Re: [BRLTTY] brl.cursor and electric fence error report

2007-05-15 Thread Jason White
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:12:54PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote: > I believe the condition was that you were on a line where the cursor was off > the right end of the braille display while you were using contracted braille. I have tested this condition with the old revision and it does indeed trigg

Re: [BRLTTY] brl.cursor and electric fence error report

2007-05-15 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Jason White on 2007/05/16 at 13:43 +1000] >With the latest revision, BRLTTY no longer writes beyond the end of the >buffer, but if the cursor is to the right of the display window in contracted >braille and then the window is advanced to include the location that the >cursor shoul