Re: [BRLTTY] Making mutt even more braille friendly

2007-06-18 Thread Jason White
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:43:27PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote: > YOu can control what a message index line looks like by setting index_format. > The subject is specified by %s. While you can specify an explicit width by > placing an integer between the two character, e.g. %20s, I don't believe the

Re: [BRLTTY] Making mutt even more braille friendly

2007-06-18 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Jason White on 2007/06/19 at 10:52 +1000] >Maybe this is already available, though I couldn't find it in the manual >pages, but an option to have subject lines fully displayed in the index view >would be helpful. > >At the moment (with the default index view), if the subject line

Re: [BRLTTY] Making mutt even more braille friendly

2007-06-18 Thread Jason White
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:54:08PM +0200, S?bastien Hinderer wrote: > Now that mutt has the braille_friendly variable, it can be used to make > mutt even more braille_friendly than what it is already. > My question: are there improvements in mutt's behaviour that you guys > would like to see implem

Re: [BRLTTY] Braille Display Barrier (was: Re: Braille keyboard layout)

2007-06-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Boris, le Mon 18 Jun 2007 17:06:22 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel, as you caught my point, have you an idea of the amount of work > to implement the BD barrier in BRLTTY or BRLAPI? >From the interface point of view, it could just be a new "half window half left/right" command. From the core point

Re: [BRLTTY] Braille Display Barrier (was: Re: Braille keyboard layout)

2007-06-18 Thread Boris
Hello Samuel, hello the list, That is it: "at some time _both_ the end of the previous line for the right hand, and the start of the next line for the left hand" with a little s/line/window so that it is even faster. In other words, what I propose is being able to move the "horizon" where my fing

Re: [BRLTTY] Braille keyboard layout

2007-06-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Dave Mielke, le Mon 18 Jun 2007 09:31:25 -0400, a écrit : > For reading, I like displays with long thumb-operated keys. As I near > the end of a line I start moving my left index finger to the left, > usually timing it so that it gets there just as my right index finger > is reading the last charac

Re: [BRLTTY] Braille keyboard layout

2007-06-18 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Sébastien Hinderer on 2007/06/17 at 13:20 +0200] >So far, I could work with two braille terminals. The first one had its >"go to next window key" at the left of the display, where as the second >one has it at the right end, more precisely under the last cells. >Between these two,

Re: [BRLTTY] Making mutt even more braille friendly

2007-06-18 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Sébastien Hinderer on 2007/06/18 at 14:54 +0200] >having the cursor positionned on messages appearing at the bottom of the >screen, I already more or less have this. The cursor jumps to the message for a short time so that I can read it, and then jumps back. I'll have to check to

[BRLTTY] Making mutt even more braille friendly

2007-06-18 Thread Sébastien Hinderer
Dear all, Now that mutt has the braille_friendly variable, it can be used to make mutt even more braille_friendly than what it is already. My question: are there improvements in mutt's behaviour that you guys would like to see implemented, making mutt even easier to use with a braille display ? Po

Re: [BRLTTY] Braille keyboard layout

2007-06-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Jason White, le Mon 18 Jun 2007 18:54:48 +1000, a écrit : > I think UTF8 support should be a significant priority, and it has been > discussed here previously as a post 3.8 possibility. Mmm, UTF-8 already works. What is left to do is Unicode support, i.e. being able to mix several not necessa

Re: [BRLTTY] Braille keyboard layout

2007-06-18 Thread Jason White
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:58:20AM +0200, S?bastien Hinderer wrote: > The orientation of the keys was preserved on the keyboard I was talking > about: simply, both previous and next window keys were located at the > beginning of the display. Thus, the layout was as follows, from left to > right: