On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:11 +, you wrote:
> Sounds great.. What you are describing is basically source and binary
> packages.
Not sure "binary package" is the right term, at least for the first
part of your description (where nothing gets built). The difference
seems more to be having
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Azoff, Justin S wrote:
>
> Sounds great.. What you are describing is basically source and binary
> packages.
In concept, I like the idea of simply extending the “install” command to be
able to install from a source or binary packages, but
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Robin Sommer wrote:
>
> @Jon: Do you think this would be doable that way?
Yeah, looks viable.
> - I’m not quite sure if the bundle should contain just the packages
> themselves or further bro-pkg state as well, such as which packages
> are